COMPARING BETWEEN PRESSURE PATCH, TARSORRHAPHY AND NON-PATCH EYE ON THE CORNEAL EPITHELIAL HEALING RATE AFTER KERALOPLASTY

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

PANAHI BAZAZ M.R.

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Jundishapur Scientific Medical Journal Year:2004 | Volume:- | Issue:40 Page(s): 13-23

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

978

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARING BETWEEN PRESSURE PATCH, TARSORRHAPHY AND NON-PATCH EYE ON THE CORNEAL EPITHELIAL HEALING RATE AFTER KERALOPLASTY

Author(s)

PANAHI BAZAZ M.R. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

KERATOPLASTYQ3

DONOR CORNEAL EPITHELIAL DEFECTQ4

TARSORRHAPHYQ4

PRESSURE PATCHQ4

Abstract

Corneal epithelial defect is one of the earlier complications after KERATOPLASTY. Therapeutic methods for enhancement of epithelial healing rate are of paramount importance for maintaining corneal graft clarity and for prevention of development of graft ulcer.In this prospective clinical the efficacy of PRESSURE PATCH, TARSORRHAPHY and non patch eye methods on the corneal epithelial healing rate after KERATOPLASTY were compared.For this purpose, 69 eyes from 69 patients with average-age of 56.6 yrs, without considering causes of KERATOPLASTY, were assigned randomly into three treatment groups. In order to evaluate corneal healing rate, all patients were examined daily with slit lamp biomicroscope for measurement of maximum and minimum dimension of the corneal epithelial defect following staining with sterile flureosien stripe. The results showed the rate of reduction in diameter of corneal epithelial defect in PRESSURE PATCH group to be 3.292 ± 0.82 mm/ day compared with 2.221 ± 1.129 mm/day in TARSORRHAPHY and 2.370 ± 1.105 mm /day in nonpatch eye groups.These findings suggest a faster corneal epithelial healing rate in PRESSURE PATCH group after KERATOPLASTY (P<0.01). However, there was no significant difference between TARSORRHAPHY with non-patch eye on the epithelial healing rate (P>0.1).

Cites

No record.

References

بررسی علل، نتایج و تاثیر پیوند قرنیه در مبتلایان به بیماری قرنیه در مرکز پزشکی لبافی نژاد طی سال های 1372-1365

Cite

APA: Copy

PANAHI BAZAZ, M.R.. (2004). COMPARING BETWEEN PRESSURE PATCH, TARSORRHAPHY AND NON-PATCH EYE ON THE CORNEAL EPITHELIAL HEALING RATE AFTER KERALOPLASTY. JUNDISHAPUR SCIENTIFIC MEDICAL JOURNAL, -(40), 13-23. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/12457/en

Vancouver: Copy

PANAHI BAZAZ M.R.. COMPARING BETWEEN PRESSURE PATCH, TARSORRHAPHY AND NON-PATCH EYE ON THE CORNEAL EPITHELIAL HEALING RATE AFTER KERALOPLASTY. JUNDISHAPUR SCIENTIFIC MEDICAL JOURNAL[Internet]. 2004;-(40):13-23. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/12457/en

IEEE: Copy

M.R. PANAHI BAZAZ, “COMPARING BETWEEN PRESSURE PATCH, TARSORRHAPHY AND NON-PATCH EYE ON THE CORNEAL EPITHELIAL HEALING RATE AFTER KERALOPLASTY,” JUNDISHAPUR SCIENTIFIC MEDICAL JOURNAL, vol. -, no. 40, pp. 13–23, 2004, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/12457/en

Related Journal Papers