THE METHODOLOGICAL CRITIQUE OF THE ROLE OF MYSTICISM IN JUDGING THE METHODOLOGY OF MULLA SADRA’S PHILOSOPHY

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

RAHBAR HASSAN; SERAJ SHAMSOLLAH; YASREBI SEYED YAHYA

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Ayeneh Ma‘refat Year:2017 | Volume:17 | Issue:51 Page(s): 1-19

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,542

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE METHODOLOGICAL CRITIQUE OF THE ROLE OF MYSTICISM IN JUDGING THE METHODOLOGY OF MULLA SADRA’S PHILOSOPHY

Author(s)

RAHBAR HASSAN | SERAJ SHAMSOLLAH | YASREBI SEYED YAHYA | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

CRITIQUE OF METHODOLOGYQ1

COLLECTION POSITIONQ1

JUDGMENT POSITIONQ1

ROLE OF MYSTICISMQ1

MULLA SADRAQ2

Abstract

One of the most important theories in relation to the methodology of MULLA SADRA’s philosophy is the distinction between collection and judgment. It is argued that, in the COLLECTION POSITION, MULLA SADRA draws on mystical intuitions. While in the JUDGMENT POSITION, he relies on reasoning as the real method of philosophical deliberations. The present paper demonstrates that, in contrast with the claim made by the proponents of the distinction theory, MULLA SADRA makes use of mystical intuitions along side reasoning in his position as the judge of the collected evidence. He not only confirms this point but he also considers it as the strong point of his philosophy. This paper argues that drawing on mystical intuitions in making judgments on philosophical issues suffers from serious flaws that can be presented in terms of ineffability, lack of transferability of mystical intuitions and the fact that they do not lend themselves to criticism.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

RAHBAR, HASSAN, SERAJ, SHAMSOLLAH, & YASREBI, SEYED YAHYA. (2017). THE METHODOLOGICAL CRITIQUE OF THE ROLE OF MYSTICISM IN JUDGING THE METHODOLOGY OF MULLA SADRA’S PHILOSOPHY. AYENEH MAREFAT, 17(51 ), 1-19. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/125164/en

Vancouver: Copy

RAHBAR HASSAN, SERAJ SHAMSOLLAH, YASREBI SEYED YAHYA. THE METHODOLOGICAL CRITIQUE OF THE ROLE OF MYSTICISM IN JUDGING THE METHODOLOGY OF MULLA SADRA’S PHILOSOPHY. AYENEH MAREFAT[Internet]. 2017;17(51 ):1-19. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/125164/en

IEEE: Copy

HASSAN RAHBAR, SHAMSOLLAH SERAJ, and SEYED YAHYA YASREBI, “THE METHODOLOGICAL CRITIQUE OF THE ROLE OF MYSTICISM IN JUDGING THE METHODOLOGY OF MULLA SADRA’S PHILOSOPHY,” AYENEH MAREFAT, vol. 17, no. 51 , pp. 1–19, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/125164/en

Related Journal Papers