EQUIVOCITY AND UNIVOCITY OF BEING FROM FAKHR AL-RAZI’S AND ATHIR AL-DIN-AL-ABHARI’S PERSPECTIVE

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

KAVANDI SAHAR; GHORBANI HASSAN; GHAREJALO DAVOOD

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Ayeneh Ma‘refat Year:2010 | Volume:8 | Issue:24 Page(s): 21-54

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,076

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

EQUIVOCITY AND UNIVOCITY OF BEING FROM FAKHR AL-RAZI’S AND ATHIR AL-DIN-AL-ABHARI’S PERSPECTIVE

Author(s)

KAVANDI SAHAR | GHORBANI HASSAN | GHAREJALO DAVOOD | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

FAKHR-E-RAZIQ2

ABHARIQ1

UNIVOCITY OF BEINGQ2

EQUIVOCITY OF BEINGQ3

Abstract

The present article is an attempt at examining one of the most important issues in ontology from the perspective of two philosophers: FAKHR-E-RAZI and Athir al-Din-e-Abhari. The importance of FAKHR-E-RAZI in detecting the history of issues and their origins is clear to everyone. Razi’s attempts in this regard can be considered as a supplementary-corrective project. His works, especially al-Mabahith al-Mashrighiyya, provides strong evidence for this claim. In his works, Razi has made an attempt to borrow the topic of univocity and EQUIVOCITY OF BEING from the works of past authors and to provide arguments for it.The issue itself can be interpreted and understood in the context of his main thought in the above-mentioned project. Razi’s corrective arguments have been embraced by his successors although the bases of this issue can be traced back in the works of his predecessors. ABHARI who has also been influenced by Razi’s ideas has adopted an approach similar to Razi’s. In his works, Razi has expressed different views on univocity and EQUIVOCITY OF BEING and it is interesting to note that ABHARI has adopted a similar approach. The present article intends to collect and present the arguments using both scholars’ views and to discuss function of this issue in theology.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

KAVANDI, SAHAR, GHORBANI, HASSAN, & GHAREJALO, DAVOOD. (2010). EQUIVOCITY AND UNIVOCITY OF BEING FROM FAKHR AL-RAZI’S AND ATHIR AL-DIN-AL-ABHARI’S PERSPECTIVE. AYENEH MAREFAT, 8(24), 21-54. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/125339/en

Vancouver: Copy

KAVANDI SAHAR, GHORBANI HASSAN, GHAREJALO DAVOOD. EQUIVOCITY AND UNIVOCITY OF BEING FROM FAKHR AL-RAZI’S AND ATHIR AL-DIN-AL-ABHARI’S PERSPECTIVE. AYENEH MAREFAT[Internet]. 2010;8(24):21-54. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/125339/en

IEEE: Copy

SAHAR KAVANDI, HASSAN GHORBANI, and DAVOOD GHAREJALO, “EQUIVOCITY AND UNIVOCITY OF BEING FROM FAKHR AL-RAZI’S AND ATHIR AL-DIN-AL-ABHARI’S PERSPECTIVE,” AYENEH MAREFAT, vol. 8, no. 24, pp. 21–54, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/125339/en

Related Journal Papers