A NEW RECAST OF GÖDEL'S ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT IN HAJEK’S LANGUAGE

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MAAREFI MOHAMMAD; FEYZBAKHSH MOHSEN

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION RESEARCH (NAMAH-I HIKMAT) Year:2016 | Volume:14 | Issue:1 (27) Page(s): 183-203

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

866

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A NEW RECAST OF GÖDEL'S ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT IN HAJEK’S LANGUAGE

Author(s)

MAAREFI MOHAMMAD | FEYZBAKHSH MOHSEN | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENTQ1

KURT GÖDELQ2

PETR HÁJEKQ1

HOWARD SOBELQ1

S5 SYSTEM OF MODAL LOGICQ1

Abstract

Since 1970, when Gödel tried to provide a new articulation of the so called ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT, many considerable discussions has been emerged due to assessment of his argument's validity and soundness. For example, Sobel tries to show some defects of Gödel's argument. PETR HÁJEK, the eminent logician and mathematician, tries to save this argument from Sobel's critiques by some small amendments. According to him, if we articulate this argument in S5 SYSTEM OF MODAL LOGIC with a few changes, we can have a safe argument. Besides, Hájek believes that this argument is of little interest from theological perspective. In this article, after a survey of Hájek’s work, we shall try to put this later claim under scrutiny and show the theological relevance of the argument. Finally, we show that despite the fact that Hájek and many other logicians consider Gödel's argument just as a "formal model" of an ancient argument, this argument seems a bona fide and justified argument for God’s existence.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MAAREFI, MOHAMMAD, & FEYZBAKHSH, MOHSEN. (2016). A NEW RECAST OF G?DEL'S ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT IN HAJEK’S LANGUAGE. PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION RESEARCH (NAMAH-I HIKMAT), 14(1 (27)), 183-203. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/125923/en

Vancouver: Copy

MAAREFI MOHAMMAD, FEYZBAKHSH MOHSEN. A NEW RECAST OF G?DEL'S ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT IN HAJEK’S LANGUAGE. PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION RESEARCH (NAMAH-I HIKMAT)[Internet]. 2016;14(1 (27)):183-203. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/125923/en

IEEE: Copy

MOHAMMAD MAAREFI, and MOHSEN FEYZBAKHSH, “A NEW RECAST OF G?DEL'S ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT IN HAJEK’S LANGUAGE,” PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION RESEARCH (NAMAH-I HIKMAT), vol. 14, no. 1 (27), pp. 183–203, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/125923/en

Related Journal Papers