BENNET’S CRITICISM OF KANT'S REFUTATION OF THEORETICAL PROOFS FOR THE EXISTENCE OF GOD

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

AZARGIN ARVIN

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION RESEARCH (NAMAH-I HIKMAT) Year:2017 | Volume:15 | Issue:1 (29) Page(s): 1-22

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

774

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

BENNET’S CRITICISM OF KANT'S REFUTATION OF THEORETICAL PROOFS FOR THE EXISTENCE OF GOD

Author(s)

AZARGIN ARVIN | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

KANTQ2

BENNETTQ1

ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENTQ2

COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENTQ2

ARGUMENT FROM DESIGNQ1

Abstract

KANT categorizes the arguments for the existence of God into ontological, cosmological, and design arguments. He holds that whereas existence is not a real and determining predicate, it is not allowed to be a part of object’s definition and so the ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT is fruitless. Along with KANT and BENNETT, I shall try to show that existence is not a perfection nor a determining predicate. Besides, contrary to BENNETT, who assesses KANT's reasoning insufficient, I argue that KANT finds the fallacy hidden in the argument and argues that the flaw of COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT is its dependence on the insecure ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT. While BENNETT truly notices the ambiguity and weakness of this relation, KANT, by appealing to a strong criticism, destructs the COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT later. Finally, despite his interest in the ARGUMENT FROM DESIGN, KANT asserts that it is based on the invalid COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT. In this stage, BENNETT criticism neglects the inherent connection between design and COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

AZARGIN, ARVIN. (2017). BENNET’S CRITICISM OF KANT'S REFUTATION OF THEORETICAL PROOFS FOR THE EXISTENCE OF GOD. PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION RESEARCH (NAMAH-I HIKMAT), 15(1 (29) ), 1-22. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/125950/en

Vancouver: Copy

AZARGIN ARVIN. BENNET’S CRITICISM OF KANT'S REFUTATION OF THEORETICAL PROOFS FOR THE EXISTENCE OF GOD. PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION RESEARCH (NAMAH-I HIKMAT)[Internet]. 2017;15(1 (29) ):1-22. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/125950/en

IEEE: Copy

ARVIN AZARGIN, “BENNET’S CRITICISM OF KANT'S REFUTATION OF THEORETICAL PROOFS FOR THE EXISTENCE OF GOD,” PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION RESEARCH (NAMAH-I HIKMAT), vol. 15, no. 1 (29) , pp. 1–22, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/125950/en

Related Journal Papers