مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

4,084
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

LAPAROSCOPIC TREATMENTS OF OVARIAN ENDOMETRIOMAS: CYSTECTOMY VERSUS CAUTRIZATION

Pages

  143-148

Abstract

 Background and Objective: OVARIAN ENDOMETRIOSIS is a condition affecting women in the reproductive age. The correlation between OVARIAN ENDOMETRIOSIS and both infertility and pain is well documented, but several aspects of this disease, including most effective treatment are not well established. So the best management of OVARIAN ENDOMETRIOSIS is controversial. In this study we want to assess the efficacy of two laparoscopic methods for the management of OVARIAN ENDOMETRIOSIS: CYSTECTOMY and cauterization, in terms of pain relief, pregnancy rate, and disease recurrence.Subjects and Methods: This is a retrospective study which was performed from 2006 to 2009. In this period, 85 patients with ovarian endometrioma operated with laparoscopy, were entered the study. One group underwent cauterization (group A) and CYSTECTOMY was performed for another group (group B). Thirty patients were studied in group A and 55 in group B. Then we compared the recurrence of signs and symptoms of endometrioma, especially pain and pregnancy rate in these two groups. Results: The recurrence of symptoms, especially pelvic pain was 83.3% in group A and 76.4% in group B after 1 year. There was no significant difference statistically. The pregnancy rate was significantly higher in group A (73.3%) than in group B (36.4%) at 1 year follow up (P<0.001). Recurrence rate was lower in group A (23.3%) than in group B (34.5%), but this difference was not significant. Conclusion: Cauterization was a better choice than CYSTECTOMY because it leads to higher pregnancy rate, and CYSTECTOMY could cause reduced follicular response in controlled ovarian hyper stimulation cycles.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    MASIHI, S., BARATI, MOZHGAN, MAREMAZI, F., & FATEMI, S.F.. (2010). LAPAROSCOPIC TREATMENTS OF OVARIAN ENDOMETRIOMAS: CYSTECTOMY VERSUS CAUTRIZATION. JUNDISHAPUR SCIENTIFIC MEDICAL JOURNAL, 9(2 (65)), 143-148. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/12837/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    MASIHI S., BARATI MOZHGAN, MAREMAZI F., FATEMI S.F.. LAPAROSCOPIC TREATMENTS OF OVARIAN ENDOMETRIOMAS: CYSTECTOMY VERSUS CAUTRIZATION. JUNDISHAPUR SCIENTIFIC MEDICAL JOURNAL[Internet]. 2010;9(2 (65)):143-148. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/12837/en

    IEEE: Copy

    S. MASIHI, MOZHGAN BARATI, F. MAREMAZI, and S.F. FATEMI, “LAPAROSCOPIC TREATMENTS OF OVARIAN ENDOMETRIOMAS: CYSTECTOMY VERSUS CAUTRIZATION,” JUNDISHAPUR SCIENTIFIC MEDICAL JOURNAL, vol. 9, no. 2 (65), pp. 143–148, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/12837/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button