A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TWO METHODS OF HOLDING ‘RESEARCH SEMINAR’ COURSE IN THE MASTER PROGRAM OF MEDICAL RECORDS EDUCATION

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

AJAMI S.; KETABI S.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF HEALTH ADMINISTRATION Year:2013 | Volume:16 | Issue:53 Page(s): 47-57

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,200

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TWO METHODS OF HOLDING ‘RESEARCH SEMINAR’ COURSE IN THE MASTER PROGRAM OF MEDICAL RECORDS EDUCATION

Author(s)

AJAMI S. | KETABI S. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

TEACHING METHODQ3

ASSESSMENTQ3

COURSE CONTENTQ3

HIERARCHICAL PROCESSQ3

Abstract

Introduction: One of the important elements in education is monitoring and evaluation of the courses to ensure that their contents are based on the real present and future needs of students. This study aimed to compare Old and New Methods of holding "Research Seminar" in the master program of medical records education. The results can determine the type of corrective actions required.Methods: The population of this applied/educational study included students studying in “Medical Records Education” in both the first and the third periods of the Faculty of Medical Management and Information Sciences in Isfahan during 2009-2010. The data were gathered by means of forms and tables (the validity of which was approved by seeking the related expert opinions) as well as through brain storming in several sessions during six months of intervention. Data analysis was done based on ranking of content and TEACHING METHODs (before and after the intervention) and using the Expert Choice software and Analytical Hierarchy Process technique.Results: According to the findings the New Method ranked higher compared with the Old Method with respect to both knowledge production and application for the students.Conclusion: Training should be changed according to learner needs. As in today's living conditions, community needs are constantly changing; it is recommended that universities and other educational centers regularly improve the content of their teaching courses.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

Related Journal Papers