POLICY GAP IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY ANALYSES: PROMOTING INNOVATION IN CONFLICT WITH TECHNOLOGY RISK

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SOUZANCHI KASHANI E.

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY Year:2009 | Volume:2 | Issue:1 Page(s): 27-41

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

1,375

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

POLICY GAP IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY ANALYSES: PROMOTING INNOVATION IN CONFLICT WITH TECHNOLOGY RISK

Author(s)

SOUZANCHI KASHANI E. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

RISKQ2

INNOVATIONQ2

TECHNOLOGY REGULATIONQ3

FRAMING ASSUMPTIONSQ3

Abstract

This paper is a critical view to two mainstream approaches to TECHNOLOGY REGULATION and their sufficiency in providing functional models for policy-making in this field. On the one hand, the literature on INNOVATION and its special attention to the role of new technologies and how to regulate them is putting forward different perspectives. On the other hand, the extensive discussion on managing the RISK of new technologies through government regulation represents another major approach to TECHNOLOGY REGULATION. The present critical appraisal shall reveal that both of them are confronting serious shortcomings in providing functional policy models and in guiding the real decisions of policy makers; this is mainly because of their restrictive assumptions. While policy makers need models to help them in assessing the RISKs and benefits of technologies simultaneously, the INNOVATION models are merely focused on the beneficial aspects of technology as opposited to the RISK models that are mainly conceraed with the RISK of new human products. Then, the discussion leads to the epistemological difficulties inherent in developing such models that pave the way for suggesting a new model at the end of the paper.

Cites

RANKING OF EFFECTIVE FACTORS ON PROMOTING INNOVATION COMPANIES IN INCUBATORS, USING FUZZY TOPSIS TECHNIQUE; CASE STUDY: YAZD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PARK

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

SOUZANCHI KASHANI, E.. (2009). POLICY GAP IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY ANALYSES: PROMOTING INNOVATION IN CONFLICT WITH TECHNOLOGY RISK . JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY, 2(1), 27-41. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/133006/en

Vancouver: Copy

SOUZANCHI KASHANI E.. POLICY GAP IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY ANALYSES: PROMOTING INNOVATION IN CONFLICT WITH TECHNOLOGY RISK . JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY[Internet]. 2009;2(1):27-41. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/133006/en

IEEE: Copy

E. SOUZANCHI KASHANI, “POLICY GAP IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY ANALYSES: PROMOTING INNOVATION IN CONFLICT WITH TECHNOLOGY RISK ,” JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 27–41, 2009, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/133006/en

Related Journal Papers