Avenues of Contact and Collaboration for Philosophy of Science with STI Policy

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MOUSSAVI ARASH

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY Year:2019 | Volume:11 | Issue:2 Page(s): 17-28

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

653

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Avenues of Contact and Collaboration for Philosophy of Science with STI Policy

Author(s)

MOUSSAVI ARASH | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Strategic Philosophy of ScienceQ2

InnovationQ2

Innovation StudiesQ1

Science and Technology PolicyQ1

InterdisciplinaryQ2

Abstract

Philosophy of science considers science as a system including conceptual and propositional structures and as processes like explanation, problem-solving, discovery, and evaluation. It studies truth, falsehood, meaningfulness, and justification. On the other hand, science, technology, and Innovation (STI) policy is a field that considers science as an economic-socialpolitical institution and studies its relationships with economic growth, competitiveness, security, employment, and welfare. Applying documentary research and conceptual analysis, this paper investigates possible paths of collaboration between these two research fields. The main conclusion of the paper is that, despite their apparent difference and separation, these two fields could cooperate in at least four productive ways: Providing philosophical analysis about epistemic constructs and common methods in STI policy, developing concepts of Innovation and economic growth to include responsible and ethical dimensions, helping to the formation of a deeper understanding of the creational aspects of Innovation process borrowing from cognitive science, and lastly but not least, helping to the formation of a critical approach to technology applying resources from philosophy of technology, are four directions that sketch landscapes of collaboration between these two fields.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MOUSSAVI, ARASH. (2019). Avenues of Contact and Collaboration for Philosophy of Science with STI Policy. JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY, 11(2 ), 17-28. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/133112/en

Vancouver: Copy

MOUSSAVI ARASH. Avenues of Contact and Collaboration for Philosophy of Science with STI Policy. JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY[Internet]. 2019;11(2 ):17-28. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/133112/en

IEEE: Copy

ARASH MOUSSAVI, “Avenues of Contact and Collaboration for Philosophy of Science with STI Policy,” JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY, vol. 11, no. 2 , pp. 17–28, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/133112/en

Related Journal Papers