Comparative Investigation of Knowledge Structure in Positivism and Sadras Philosophy

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SHARIFANI MOHAMMAD

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: ANDISHE-E-NOVIN-E-DINI Year:2019 | Volume:15 | Issue:57 Page(s): 135-144

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

594

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Comparative Investigation of Knowledge Structure in Positivism and Sadras Philosophy

Author(s)

SHARIFANI MOHAMMAD | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

KnowledgeQ1

Sadras philosophyQ1

positivismQ2

presential knowledgeQ2

conceptQ2

judgmentQ2

meaningfulnessQ2

religious propositionsQ1

Abstract

positivism, whether it be Contes or logical, purports to have the sole monopoly of episteme in relation to tangible and nonsensical issues or meaninglessness of concepts as well as metaphysical matters including philosophical, religious and ethical ones. This school fails to account for the origin of concepts and of judgments and the realm of Knowledge, and takes its road to skepticism in the human epistemological processes and dimensions. However, Sadras philosophy has been able to explain concept-and judgment-related laws via its profound intellectual precision concerning the notion of Knowledge in addition to final criteria to define Knowledge and its standards to divide into the Knowledge by presence and Knowledge by acquisition. Based on this school of thought, concept-and judgment-related Knowledge types have their roots both in sense-data and meta-sensory origins. Consequently, meta-sensory notions and propositions including religious and ethical Knowledge lend themselves to comprehension, explanation and verification. The present study explored the aforementioned axes from the viewpoint of both schools on the basis of verdicts in both schools sources, and afterwards presented values and reasoning of religious and meta-sensory Knowledge in Sadras philosophy with utmost meaning.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

SHARIFANI, MOHAMMAD. (2019). Comparative Investigation of Knowledge Structure in Positivism and Sadra?s Philosophy. ANDISHE-E-NOVIN-E-DINI, 15(57 ), 135-144. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/133529/en

Vancouver: Copy

SHARIFANI MOHAMMAD. Comparative Investigation of Knowledge Structure in Positivism and Sadra?s Philosophy. ANDISHE-E-NOVIN-E-DINI[Internet]. 2019;15(57 ):135-144. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/133529/en

IEEE: Copy

MOHAMMAD SHARIFANI, “Comparative Investigation of Knowledge Structure in Positivism and Sadra?s Philosophy,” ANDISHE-E-NOVIN-E-DINI, vol. 15, no. 57 , pp. 135–144, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/133529/en

Related Journal Papers