Inference of Religious Laws, and Prove of Criminal Proceeding in Conflict of Evidences: Commons and Differences

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Motaghi Ardakani Omid; MOJTAHED SOLEIMANI ABOLHASSAN

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC LAW AND JURISPRUDENCE RESEARCHES Year:2019 | Volume:15 | Issue:57 Page(s): 179-202

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

718

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Inference of Religious Laws, and Prove of Criminal Proceeding in Conflict of Evidences: Commons and Differences

Author(s)

Motaghi Ardakani Omid | MOJTAHED SOLEIMANI ABOLHASSAN | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

ConflictQ1

Reason (Evidence)Q2

LawQ2

ProofQ2

ProceedingQ1

Abstract

Iran's legislator, in 2013, for the first time provided the "Conflict of evidences in prove of criminal Proceeding" in some articles of Islamic Penal Code. In this respect without mention of occurrence terms, some cases of Conflicts of evidences are mentioned, and some measures are provided. Although this matter is applicable as the first step to formalization of this Conflict, whether in occurrence term or transitional solutions, it depends on jurisprudential-legal notions about Conflict of Proofs of inference as the root of Conflict principles. So, this research in a descriptive-analytical manner seeks to study these point of views, and their convergence or divergence against Conflicts of evidences of substantiation of claim. The findings shows that required terms of this Conflict, whether for inference of religious Laws or on evidences of substantiation of claims are the same; however solutions need more consideration in Proof of criminal claim than procedure of inference of religious Laws.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Motaghi Ardakani, Omid, & MOJTAHED SOLEIMANI, ABOLHASSAN. (2019). Inference of Religious Laws, and Prove of Criminal Proceeding in Conflict of Evidences: Commons and Differences. JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC LAW AND JURISPRUDENCE RESEARCHES, 15(57 ), 179-202. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/134393/en

Vancouver: Copy

Motaghi Ardakani Omid, MOJTAHED SOLEIMANI ABOLHASSAN. Inference of Religious Laws, and Prove of Criminal Proceeding in Conflict of Evidences: Commons and Differences. JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC LAW AND JURISPRUDENCE RESEARCHES[Internet]. 2019;15(57 ):179-202. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/134393/en

IEEE: Copy

Omid Motaghi Ardakani, and ABOLHASSAN MOJTAHED SOLEIMANI, “Inference of Religious Laws, and Prove of Criminal Proceeding in Conflict of Evidences: Commons and Differences,” JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC LAW AND JURISPRUDENCE RESEARCHES, vol. 15, no. 57 , pp. 179–202, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/134393/en

Related Journal Papers