EVALUATION AND COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL ETHICAL DECISION-MAKING MODELS IN MEDICINE

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MADANI MANSOUREH; SAEEDI TEHRANI SAEEDEH

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Iranian Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine Year:2016 | Volume:9 | Issue:1 Page(s): 11-25

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

2,025

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

EVALUATION AND COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL ETHICAL DECISION-MAKING MODELS IN MEDICINE

Author(s)

MADANI MANSOUREH | SAEEDI TEHRANI SAEEDEH | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

ETHICAL DECISION-MAKINGQ2

ETHICAL CHALLENGESQ2

ETHICAL DILEMMASQ2

ETHICAL DECISION- MAKING MODELSQ2

Abstract

Moral dilemmas are among the most important challenges in medical ethics. Dilemmas can occur frequently during a physician’s career and if physicians lack the ability and skills to solve them, they may be pushed to unethical behavior. Bioethics experts have always been concerned with solving ETHICAL DILEMMAS in the medical profession and facilitating physicians’ decision-making process. Therefore, they often try to find useful and practical solutions by combining the views of different schools of ethics. Designing decision-making models is part of their effort to apply ethics in medicine. It is impossible to solve dilemmas without acquiring the necessary skills, and the ability to apply a decision-making model can be part of the training process.These models aim to facilitate ETHICAL DECISION-MAKING in the field of health care by providing various frameworks. This article aims to introduce and evaluate the popular models of ETHICAL DECISION-MAKING in medicine in the hope of helping physicians choose appropriate solutions when faced with moral challenges. By presenting the advantages of applying the model approach and offering a brief introduction to popular models, the article recommends applying the approach in analyzing and resolving ETHICAL DILEMMAS. Although the models each have their advantages and disadvantages, becoming proficient in their application will facilitate ETHICAL DECISION-MAKING for physicians.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MADANI, MANSOUREH, & SAEEDI TEHRANI, SAEEDEH. (2016). EVALUATION AND COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL ETHICAL DECISION-MAKING MODELS IN MEDICINE. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS AND HISTORY OF MEDICINE, 9(1), 11-25. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/135415/en

Vancouver: Copy

MADANI MANSOUREH, SAEEDI TEHRANI SAEEDEH. EVALUATION AND COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL ETHICAL DECISION-MAKING MODELS IN MEDICINE. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS AND HISTORY OF MEDICINE[Internet]. 2016;9(1):11-25. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/135415/en

IEEE: Copy

MANSOUREH MADANI, and SAEEDEH SAEEDI TEHRANI, “EVALUATION AND COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL ETHICAL DECISION-MAKING MODELS IN MEDICINE,” JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS AND HISTORY OF MEDICINE, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 11–25, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/135415/en

Related Journal Papers