مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,268
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Siyasat-nama and Discursive Turn in Iranian Political Thought; the Speech Act Analysis of Siyar al-mulû k

Pages

  125-156

Abstract

 The relation between author and social context in discourse turn of Iranian and Islamic Political Thought is a matter of great concern. The social contexts of 7th to 9th centuries created new condition which in turn paved the ground for change and development of Iranian and Islamic political philosophy and its Discursive Turn. In response to this change and political contexts of Iranian-Islamic society, emerged three schools of thought among the thinkers of this period. Al-Mawardi and introducing of caliphate system, Al-Ghazali with Islamic justification of authority of the Kings in order to reconcile between caliphate and kingship and, finally, Nizam al-Mulk by Siyasatnama (The Book of Government) who tried to pass the caliphate system and articulate a new discourse. Relying on the Iranian tradition of Ideal King, Nizam al-Mulk tries to justify kingship with an expedient approach. Such a conflict is distinguishable in Siyasatnama. Within this book, there is a conflict between three discourses: caliphate, kingship and religious discourse of resistance. This paper is going to verify the hypothesis that Nizam al-Mulk has played the role of “ poiltical subjective” in the discursive transformation from writing Shariatnama (Islamic laws) to Andarzname (Book of advice). He uses three lingual strategies in order to play Subjective Situation role: to omit caliphate discourse by “ concealing” it, and highlight the kingship discourse by excluding other discourses of resistance that are traceable in the book. The methodology of the article is a combination of Laclau and Mouffe discourse theory and micro-level approach of Van leeuwen Discourse Analysis.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    AKVANI, HAMDOLLAH. (2019). Siyasat-nama and Discursive Turn in Iranian Political Thought; the Speech Act Analysis of Siyar al-mulû k. PIZHUHISH-I SIYASAT-I NAZARI: RESEARCH IN POLITICAL SCIENCE, New(25 ), 125-156. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/136075/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    AKVANI HAMDOLLAH. Siyasat-nama and Discursive Turn in Iranian Political Thought; the Speech Act Analysis of Siyar al-mulû k. PIZHUHISH-I SIYASAT-I NAZARI: RESEARCH IN POLITICAL SCIENCE[Internet]. 2019;New(25 ):125-156. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/136075/en

    IEEE: Copy

    HAMDOLLAH AKVANI, “Siyasat-nama and Discursive Turn in Iranian Political Thought; the Speech Act Analysis of Siyar al-mulû k,” PIZHUHISH-I SIYASAT-I NAZARI: RESEARCH IN POLITICAL SCIENCE, vol. New, no. 25 , pp. 125–156, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/136075/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top