AN ANALYSIS OF USULIS* MODEL OF PHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

GHARA MALEKI A.F.; GHARAMALEKI A.M.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA Year:2004 | Volume:37 | Issue:75(3) Page(s): 105-124

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,199

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

AN ANALYSIS OF USULIS* MODEL OF PHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE

Author(s)

GHARA MALEKI A.F. | GHARAMALEKI A.M. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

ARISTOTELIAN PHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGEQ4

KHORASANIQ4

IMAM KHOMEINIQ3

USUL AL-FIQHQ3

SUBJECT OF THE SCIENCEQ4

ESSENTIAL ACCIDENTS.Q4

Abstract

Usulis and jurists should make jurisprudence and Usul al-Figh in conformity with a specific model of philosophy of knowledge in order to indicate that those two are two independent sciences having certain cognitive, epistemological identities. The major problem in the philosophy of knowledge is the unifying as well as distinctive criterion for oneness of problems of a science. Jurists and Usulis only model of philosophy of knowledge was Aristotelian logical philosophy of knowledge. That philosophy of knowledge is subject-axis. To indicate the subject of science of Usul al-Fiqh and to assert that problems of Usul are ESSENTIAL ACCIDENTS.of that subject, would cause several disputes and challenging discussions. For almost ten centuries, the position of Usulis was to indicate compatibility of Usul al-Figh with Aristotelian model of philosophy of knowledge and to solve, with some difficulty, problems caused by it. KHORASANI criticized Aristotelian model of philosophy of knowledge and presented an end-axis philosophy of knowledge. Following a detailed theory, such men of thought as Tabatabaee distinguished real sciences from mentally-posited ones confirming Aristotelian philosophy of knowledge in the for.mer and KHORASANIs model in the latter. IMAM KHOMEINI holds that historical development of sciences is the best proof for incompatibility of all sciences whether real or mentally-posited with the Aristotelian model. That historical insight presents a new model of philosophy of sciences.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

GHARA MALEKI, A.F., & GHARAMALEKI, A.M.. (2004). AN ANALYSIS OF USULIS* MODEL OF PHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE. MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA, 37(75(3)), 105-124. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/13688/en

Vancouver: Copy

GHARA MALEKI A.F., GHARAMALEKI A.M.. AN ANALYSIS OF USULIS* MODEL OF PHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE. MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA[Internet]. 2004;37(75(3)):105-124. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/13688/en

IEEE: Copy

A.F. GHARA MALEKI, and A.M. GHARAMALEKI, “AN ANALYSIS OF USULIS* MODEL OF PHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE,” MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA, vol. 37, no. 75(3), pp. 105–124, 2004, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/13688/en

Related Journal Papers