A GLANCE AT THE EQUILIBRIUM AND PRIORITIES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ALAVI S.M.

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA Year:2006 | Volume:39 | Issue:80 (FIQH AND THE FUNDAMENTS OF ISLAMIC JURISPRUENCE) Page(s): 99-124

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

4,105

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A GLANCE AT THE EQUILIBRIUM AND PRIORITIES

Author(s)

ALAVI S.M. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

ANTICIPATORY TRADITIONSQ3

ESSENTIAL TRADITIONSQ3

PRIORITIESQ3

EQUILIBRIUMQ4

POSITIONQ3

EXPLICIT AND NON EXPLICIT PRIORITIESQ3

Abstract

The discussion about the EQUILIBRIUM and PRIORITIES or the opposition of proofs are among the important principals which has disguised itself from discussion of religious jurisprudence to basic principles as much as someone believe that are the most important matters of principles. Opposition between two proofs is sometimes infixed and is eliminated from the popular view. It is out of discussion such as two common and particular and absolute or finite proof. Opposition between two proofs is sometimes fixed and in any respect peer and EQUILIBRIUM. Moreover, descending or alternation of these proofs has observed by principles and or one is preferable. Such a preference has been released in explicit PRIORITIES or has not been noticed in non-explicit. In this case, variation and preference of preferable proof is cared for principalities. Any selection of them steps beyond clergyman a special way in deduction of religious orders in contrast to oppose proofs. In this paper, after appraisal dialectics and views of variation and preference followers, inclination of preference, which Sheikh Ansari is its pioneer, will be emphasized.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

ALAVI, S.M.. (2006). A GLANCE AT THE EQUILIBRIUM AND PRIORITIES. MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA, 39(80 (FIQH AND THE FUNDAMENTS OF ISLAMIC JURISPRUENCE)), 99-124. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/13737/en

Vancouver: Copy

ALAVI S.M.. A GLANCE AT THE EQUILIBRIUM AND PRIORITIES. MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA[Internet]. 2006;39(80 (FIQH AND THE FUNDAMENTS OF ISLAMIC JURISPRUENCE)):99-124. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/13737/en

IEEE: Copy

S.M. ALAVI, “A GLANCE AT THE EQUILIBRIUM AND PRIORITIES,” MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA, vol. 39, no. 80 (FIQH AND THE FUNDAMENTS OF ISLAMIC JURISPRUENCE), pp. 99–124, 2006, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/13737/en

Related Journal Papers