METHODOLOGICAL CRITIQUE OF HYALO'S AFFIRMATION PROOFS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ZAHABI S.A.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA Year:2006 | Volume:39 | Issue:81 Page(s): 11-30

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,012

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

METHODOLOGICAL CRITIQUE OF HYALO'S AFFIRMATION PROOFS

Author(s)

ZAHABI S.A. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

HYALO (MATTER)Q3

MATERIAL PHYSIQUEQ4

CONNECTION AND CONNECTION (FASL WA VASL)Q3

DISTENSION AND CONDENSATION (TAKHALKHOL WA TAKATHOF)Q3

POTENTIALITY AND ACTUALITY (QOVVEI WAFE' AL)Q4

Abstract

The term of Hyalo (matter) is as much current in philosophical discussions that its existence has become a definitive hypothesis, so there is no attention to proofs affirms its being, The critical approach to philosophers' viewpoints reveals significant faults in these reasoning, In ontological philosophy three proofs for affirmation of Hyalo are used: Fasl wa Vasl proof (connection and disconnection)- Takhalkhol and Takathof proof (distension and condensation)-Qovveh and Fe'al Proof (potentiality and actuality), However, all of them involve in an important methodological problem, These philosophers have observed natural world by trusting on external senses, so they have gone beyond metaphysics and have put experimental and material extensions as the base of metaphysical principals. They have chosen a particular definition of "Material Physique" (jism) and then have presented the proofs that are not correct. Therefore, we can declare two classes of faults in these proofs; one of them is common in all these three and the second one depends on everyone separately.So, all of the Hyalo's affirmative proofs and arguments that depend on them are wrong. Thus, we should review some philosophical arguments, such as substantial movement etc.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

ZAHABI, S.A.. (2006). METHODOLOGICAL CRITIQUE OF HYALO'S AFFIRMATION PROOFS. MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA, 39(81), 11-30. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/13739/en

Vancouver: Copy

ZAHABI S.A.. METHODOLOGICAL CRITIQUE OF HYALO'S AFFIRMATION PROOFS. MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA[Internet]. 2006;39(81):11-30. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/13739/en

IEEE: Copy

S.A. ZAHABI, “METHODOLOGICAL CRITIQUE OF HYALO'S AFFIRMATION PROOFS,” MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA, vol. 39, no. 81, pp. 11–30, 2006, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/13739/en

Related Journal Papers