مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

758
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

CONFRONTATION OF RIGHT AND EXPEDIENCY (WITH AN EMPHASIS ON TERRORIST OFFENCES)

Pages

  147-173

Abstract

 One of the most fundamental philosophical issues, which is examined in political philosophy and philosophy of law, is CONFRONTATION of RIGHT and EXPEDIENCY. One side of this CONFRONTATION are people and their RIGHTs who expect the recognition of minimum fundamental RIGHTs, like the RIGHT to a FAIR TRIAL, which belongs them under the humans dignity and personality. On the other side, society by the aid of its representatives, while trying to produce minimum resources for people and securing their welfare, has also a glance to its maintainance and continuance, by complying with some interests. This CONFRONTATION between humans RIGHTs and community interests, arrives its summit in TERRORIST OFFENCES and this, forms the most important philosophical base of differential criminal proceeding in TERRORIST OFFENCES. On one hand, suspects of terrorist activities want a FAIR TRIAL as an undeniable RIGHT for human kind and on the other hand, political and judicial authorities seek to retain security of society, and see suspending and ignoring terrorist suspects’ RIGHTs, as one of resorts for achieving this aim. They regard suspension and ignorance of this group’s RIGHTs, as securing security. After explanation of this CONFRONTATION and its quality in TERRORIST OFFENCES, in this essay, is tried to produce logical resorts for its resolution.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    GHADIRI BAHRAM ABADI, RASHID. (2017). CONFRONTATION OF RIGHT AND EXPEDIENCY (WITH AN EMPHASIS ON TERRORIST OFFENCES). THE JUDICIARY’S LAW JOURNAL, 81(98 ), 147-173. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/137900/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    GHADIRI BAHRAM ABADI RASHID. CONFRONTATION OF RIGHT AND EXPEDIENCY (WITH AN EMPHASIS ON TERRORIST OFFENCES). THE JUDICIARY’S LAW JOURNAL[Internet]. 2017;81(98 ):147-173. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/137900/en

    IEEE: Copy

    RASHID GHADIRI BAHRAM ABADI, “CONFRONTATION OF RIGHT AND EXPEDIENCY (WITH AN EMPHASIS ON TERRORIST OFFENCES),” THE JUDICIARY’S LAW JOURNAL, vol. 81, no. 98 , pp. 147–173, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/137900/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button