مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

424
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Ethical Considerations in Dealing with Terrorist Crimes in Iran And U. S. Law

Pages

  35-49

Abstract

 Background and Aim: Today, the spread of terrorism as one of the most important Security challenges has led to an implementation of a discriminatory Procedure; That is, the defendants of these crimes have been prosecuted in a different and more rigorous manner than other criminals, and some of the rights that other defendants enjoy are denied. Materials and Methods: This is a descriptive-analytical Study. Ethical Considerations: Honesty and confidentiality have been observed. Findings: Implementing a discriminatory Procedure for defendants of Terrorist Crimes is socially beneficial and is a moral choice; because by taking hard on defendants ensures the maintenance of Public Order and enhances the community Security. It also provides the groundwork to prevent citizens from harms as a result of terrorist acts in the future. However, the restriction of individual liberties (such as the prolongation of temporary detention) and the deprivation of these defendants' rights over other criminals have led to unfair discrimination and question the judicial justice. Conclusion: Discriminatory Procedure of Terrorist Crimes defendants is an unethical, unjust and discriminatory choice. But it will be an ethical choice from the viewpoint of society as a whole and the need to maintain order and Security of citizens. In both, the United States and Iran, the same approach of preferring the interests of society to the individual has been confirmed.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    Noorashrafoddin, Seyed Vali, & HAJITABAR FIROOZJAI, HASSAN. (2020). Ethical Considerations in Dealing with Terrorist Crimes in Iran And U. S. Law. JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY LEGAL RESEARCH, 1(2 ), 35-49. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/381112/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    Noorashrafoddin Seyed Vali, HAJITABAR FIROOZJAI HASSAN. Ethical Considerations in Dealing with Terrorist Crimes in Iran And U. S. Law. JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY LEGAL RESEARCH[Internet]. 2020;1(2 ):35-49. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/381112/en

    IEEE: Copy

    Seyed Vali Noorashrafoddin, and HASSAN HAJITABAR FIROOZJAI, “Ethical Considerations in Dealing with Terrorist Crimes in Iran And U. S. Law,” JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY LEGAL RESEARCH, vol. 1, no. 2 , pp. 35–49, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/381112/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button