INTENTIONALITY AND REPRESENTATION IN THE DIALOGUE BETWEEN DREYFUS AND SEARLE

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MOHAMAD ALI KHALAJ MOHAMAD HOSEIN; HESHMATI ATA

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Philosophical Investigations in Scopus Year:2017 | Volume:11 | Issue:20 Page(s): 91-116

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

678

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

INTENTIONALITY AND REPRESENTATION IN THE DIALOGUE BETWEEN DREYFUS AND SEARLE

Author(s)

MOHAMAD ALI KHALAJ MOHAMAD HOSEIN | HESHMATI ATA | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

INTENTIONALITYQ2

REPRESENTATIONQ1

PHENOMENOLOGYQ1

ANALYTIC PHILOSOPHYQ2

DUALISMQ2

Abstract

Dialogue between Dreyfus, as the biggest American commentator of Heidegger and Merleau- Ponty, and Searle, as one of the biggest analytic philosophers, started at the seventies. According to Searle, PHENOMENOLOGY is superficially and blind and has systematic errors. Additionally, in his view the concept of non-representational intention as center of Dreyfus’s PHENOMENOLOGY is inconsistent. But, in our opinion, Dreyfus introduces a consistent concept of non-representational intention, and proposes that Searle does not have a sound understanding of PHENOMENOLOGY. Dreyfus draws a distinction between two interpretations of Searle: Searle as phenomenologist and Searle as analytic philosopher. Dreyfus believes Searle’s approach as a phenomenologist is wrong because ignores non-representational intention; He also criticizes Searle’s approach as analytic philosopher because this approach accepts causality for an abstract structure. However, we believe that Dreyfus himself fails to go beyond the subject-object DUALISM. Moreover, we show in this paper that introducing non-representational intention is not sufficient for rejecting Descartes DUALISM.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MOHAMAD ALI KHALAJ, MOHAMAD HOSEIN, & HESHMATI, ATA. (2017). INTENTIONALITY AND REPRESENTATION IN THE DIALOGUE BETWEEN DREYFUS AND SEARLE. PHILOSOPHICAL INVESTIGATION (JOURNAL OF FACULTY OF LETTERS AND HUMANITIES) (TABRIZ), 11(20 ), 91-116. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/140917/en

Vancouver: Copy

MOHAMAD ALI KHALAJ MOHAMAD HOSEIN, HESHMATI ATA. INTENTIONALITY AND REPRESENTATION IN THE DIALOGUE BETWEEN DREYFUS AND SEARLE. PHILOSOPHICAL INVESTIGATION (JOURNAL OF FACULTY OF LETTERS AND HUMANITIES) (TABRIZ)[Internet]. 2017;11(20 ):91-116. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/140917/en

IEEE: Copy

MOHAMAD HOSEIN MOHAMAD ALI KHALAJ, and ATA HESHMATI, “INTENTIONALITY AND REPRESENTATION IN THE DIALOGUE BETWEEN DREYFUS AND SEARLE,” PHILOSOPHICAL INVESTIGATION (JOURNAL OF FACULTY OF LETTERS AND HUMANITIES) (TABRIZ), vol. 11, no. 20 , pp. 91–116, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/140917/en

Related Journal Papers