The Evaluation of Iranian midwifery Ph. D. course based on the CIPP model

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Hasanzadeh Robab; GhanbariHomaie Solmaz; Mohammad Alizadehcahrandabi Sakineh; Iravani Mina; Hajimirzaie Saiedeh Sadat; Khosravi Shahla; Abedi Parvin; Mirghafourvand Mojgan

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Future of Medical Education Journal Year:2023 | Volume:13 | Issue:3 Page(s): 15-20

Download Full-Text

View:

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

The Evaluation of Iranian midwifery Ph. D. course based on the CIPP model

Author(s)

Keywords

Course EvaluationQ4

CIPP ModelQ4

MidwiferyQ4

IranQ4

Abstract

Background: A high-quality Ph. D. course requires frequent assessment and identification of deficiencies and limitations. The Midwifery Ph. D. course started in 2016 in Iran and since no evaluation has been performed on this program, the present study aimed to evaluate the Iranian Midwifery Ph. D. course based on the CIPP Model. Method: This descriptive-evaluative research was conducted based on the CIPP Model in 2021 in the schools of nursing and Midwifery of Tabriz and Ahvaz Universities of medical sciences, Iran. The statistical population included the faculty members of the Midwifery Ph. D. program (9 individuals) and Midwifery Ph. D. graduates and students (21 individuals). The data collection tools comprised CIPP-based questionnaires exclusively for faculty members and students. Descriptive statistics were employed for data analysis. Results: Most students (81%) and faculty members (77. 8%) reported an appropriate general evaluation of the Midwifery Ph. D. curriculum. Most faculty members (77. 8%) and students (90. 8%) reported the indicators of the Midwifery Ph. D. curriculum as appropriate in terms of context. More than three forth of faculty members (77. 8%) and more than half of the students (57. 1%) reported this curriculum as appropriate regarding input. This program was also reported to be appropriate according to 52. 4% of students and 66. 7% of faculty members in terms of process. Furthermore, a total of 66. 7% of participants in both groups reported an appropriate status in terms of output. Conclusion: Midwifery Ph. D. curriculum was reported as an appropriate program. Also, students of this discipline requested greater stress on clinical upskilling for Midwifery Ph. D.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops