Referring Matter Mistake to Formal Mistake; Nasir al-Din Tusi and Ghotb Razi Explain Avicenna’ s Discussion

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Asaadi Hossein; HAGHI ALI

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Avicennian Philosophy Journal Year:2019 | Volume:23 | Issue:61 Page(s): 233-249

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

473

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Referring Matter Mistake to Formal Mistake; Nasir al-Din Tusi and Ghotb Razi Explain Avicenna’ s Discussion

Author(s)

Asaadi Hossein | HAGHI ALI | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Matter mistakeQ1

Formal mistakeQ1

AvicennaQ2

Nasir alDin TusiQ2

Ghotb RaziQ1

FallacyQ2

Abstract

The main problem of this paper is “ Matter mistake” and “ Formal mistake” and its result is "Matter mistake is meaningless; what is in principle described as correct and incorrect form". Studies showed Avicenna has no statement or proof about Matter mistake and his definition of logic can be a start point for Classical logic. By accepting this statement, we need to accept a role for Matter mistake in the Fallacy argument. Nasir al-Din Tusi has used it and neglects all Matter mistakes in Fallacy, but on the other hand, Ghotb considered a place for it and so his argument is not consistent with this statement. Ghotb believes that Matter mistake has no meaning by comparing it to the real world due to the casual and necessity of foundations of knowledge. This belief also exists in Nasir al-Din Tusi's thought but it is due to premises of syllogism and logical definitions. Now we think since these traditional logical discussions are so general and denotation criteria are not the same, so it has no contradiction to consider mistakes accompanying matter.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Asaadi, Hossein, & HAGHI, ALI. (2019). Referring Matter Mistake to Formal Mistake; Nasir al-Din Tusi and Ghotb Razi Explain Avicenna’ s Discussion. AVICINIAN PHILOSOPHY JOURNAL, 23(61 ), 233-249. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/145591/en

Vancouver: Copy

Asaadi Hossein, HAGHI ALI. Referring Matter Mistake to Formal Mistake; Nasir al-Din Tusi and Ghotb Razi Explain Avicenna’ s Discussion. AVICINIAN PHILOSOPHY JOURNAL[Internet]. 2019;23(61 ):233-249. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/145591/en

IEEE: Copy

Hossein Asaadi, and ALI HAGHI, “Referring Matter Mistake to Formal Mistake; Nasir al-Din Tusi and Ghotb Razi Explain Avicenna’ s Discussion,” AVICINIAN PHILOSOPHY JOURNAL, vol. 23, no. 61 , pp. 233–249, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/145591/en

Related Journal Papers