A CRITIQUE ON THE THEORY OF REFERENCE OF BASIC SELF-EVIDENT PREMISES TO INTUITIVE KNOWLEDGE (IN IBNE-SINA, MESBAH YAZDI)

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

HOUSINI SHAROUDI SEYED MORTEZA; MASOUDI JAHANKIR; AZIZIYAN MOSLEH MISAM

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Avicennian Philosophy Journal Year:2016 | Volume:20 | Issue:55 Page(s): 63-80

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

572

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A CRITIQUE ON THE THEORY OF REFERENCE OF BASIC SELF-EVIDENT PREMISES TO INTUITIVE KNOWLEDGE (IN IBNE-SINA, MESBAH YAZDI)

Author(s)

HOUSINI SHAROUDI SEYED MORTEZA | MASOUDI JAHANKIR | AZIZIYAN MOSLEH MISAM | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

INTUITIVE KNOWLEDGEQ2

CONCEPTUAL KNOWLEDGEQ2

SELF-EVIDENT PREMISESQ2

BASIC PROPOSITIONQ1

Abstract

Recognizing truthfulness of basic SELF-EVIDENT PREMISES is one of the important concerns of epistemology. Ibn-e Sina considers these propositions as self-evident truths (classical theory). Among the contemporary thinkers, Mesbah Yazdi does not consider this solution as sufficient and has found it as problematic. According to his opinion, verification of the truthfulness and the true totality of the propositions are dependent on transcending concepts and using intuition knowledge instead. This is how one can make sure that SELF-EVIDENT PREMISES are not abstract and mental textures, but objective and general truths. The following essay includes 3 parts: first is statement of problem. Second part is the explication and criticism of mesbah′s classic theory. And third part is dealing with resolving questions posed about it. There are two major issues in this sphere: first, both concepts of reference of basic SELF-EVIDENT PREMISES to INTUITIVE KNOWLEDGE are true. The second issue is that verifying the truthfulness of general proposition over a specific one is due to a mistake concept in respect of significance for it in respect of existence. In conclusion, we think there are some traces of Mesbah′s theory in Avicenna's too.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

HOUSINI SHAROUDI, SEYED MORTEZA, MASOUDI, JAHANKIR, & AZIZIYAN MOSLEH, MISAM. (2016). A CRITIQUE ON THE THEORY OF REFERENCE OF BASIC SELF-EVIDENT PREMISES TO INTUITIVE KNOWLEDGE (IN IBNE-SINA, MESBAH YAZDI). AVICINIAN PHILOSOPHY JOURNAL, 20(55), 63-80. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/145601/en

Vancouver: Copy

HOUSINI SHAROUDI SEYED MORTEZA, MASOUDI JAHANKIR, AZIZIYAN MOSLEH MISAM. A CRITIQUE ON THE THEORY OF REFERENCE OF BASIC SELF-EVIDENT PREMISES TO INTUITIVE KNOWLEDGE (IN IBNE-SINA, MESBAH YAZDI). AVICINIAN PHILOSOPHY JOURNAL[Internet]. 2016;20(55):63-80. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/145601/en

IEEE: Copy

SEYED MORTEZA HOUSINI SHAROUDI, JAHANKIR MASOUDI, and MISAM AZIZIYAN MOSLEH, “A CRITIQUE ON THE THEORY OF REFERENCE OF BASIC SELF-EVIDENT PREMISES TO INTUITIVE KNOWLEDGE (IN IBNE-SINA, MESBAH YAZDI),” AVICINIAN PHILOSOPHY JOURNAL, vol. 20, no. 55, pp. 63–80, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/145601/en

Related Journal Papers