مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

667
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON GAZZALI'S AND AVICCENA'S ARGUMENT OF IMMATERIAL SOUL

Pages

  123-137

Abstract

 Avicenna suggests an argument about IMMATERIAL SOUL which was based on INTELLECTUAL CONCEPTS. Gazzali criticized the argument and then restudied it. After that he developed it by another method. The first proposition of Gazzali's argument is different from AVICENNA's. In fact, AVICENNA's argument is based on INTELLECTUAL CONCEPTS and includes all the universal concepts. While Gazzali's argument is based on the concept of God and the DIVINE KNOWLEDGE. Both arguments, however, have the same second proposition that is "every intellectual concept is indivisible". AVICENNA believed that intellectual concept is divisible in mind. While Gazzali held DIVINE KNOWLEDGE isn't divisible neither regard to quantity nor regard to conceptuality .Both thinkers have the same problem about the second proposition of the argument, Gazzali criticizes the second proposition but he couldn't solve it and again used  it as the second proposition of the argument. This argument obtains a method which consists of reason and gnosis.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    SERAJIPOUR, NASRIN. (2018). A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON GAZZALI'S AND AVICCENA'S ARGUMENT OF IMMATERIAL SOUL. AVICINIAN PHILOSOPHY JOURNAL, 21(58 ), 123-137. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/145636/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    SERAJIPOUR NASRIN. A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON GAZZALI'S AND AVICCENA'S ARGUMENT OF IMMATERIAL SOUL. AVICINIAN PHILOSOPHY JOURNAL[Internet]. 2018;21(58 ):123-137. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/145636/en

    IEEE: Copy

    NASRIN SERAJIPOUR, “A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON GAZZALI'S AND AVICCENA'S ARGUMENT OF IMMATERIAL SOUL,” AVICINIAN PHILOSOPHY JOURNAL, vol. 21, no. 58 , pp. 123–137, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/145636/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button