مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

674
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE VIEWS OF QOM & NISHAPUR IMAMS' SAHABEH ABOUT IMAMATE

Pages

  31-50

Abstract

 During late 2nd century, QOM and NISHABUR were of most important cities which housed numerous Shi'a scholars who collected Imams' Hadiths. Although there were fundamental differences betweenthe social textures of Imams Sahabeh regarding rationality and Hadiths, there were some similarities between the two thought courses, mostly named as "Moaredh Stream"[Contrast stream]. This stream of thought which could be said to belong to the Shi'a majority, believed in the relationship between Imams and angels and a sort of non-prophetic inspiration or revelation for Imams; however, controverted any exaggeration and superiority and preponderance about them. On the other hand marginal streams could be regarded as outcomes of Hisham ibn Hakam and mofazzal bin Omar opinions which had some followers in both QOM and NISHABUR. Itseems QOM and NISHABUR, despite all their dissimilarities and differences, got to similar upshots regarding Imamate. Three thought lines were present in both cities: first thatof the majority supported by the city scientific scholars and Faqihs, second, Hisham Hakam view point and third, Mofazzal bin Omar view point.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    SADEGHANI, MAJID, CHELONGAR, MOHAMMAD ALI, PIRMORADIAN, MOSTAFA, & SAMADANIYAN, MOHSEN. (2017). A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE VIEWS OF QOM & NISHAPUR IMAMS' SAHABEH ABOUT IMAMATE. JOURNAL OF HISTORICAL RESEARCHES (UNIVERSITY OF ISFAHAN), 53(2 (34) ), 31-50. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/148684/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    SADEGHANI MAJID, CHELONGAR MOHAMMAD ALI, PIRMORADIAN MOSTAFA, SAMADANIYAN MOHSEN. A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE VIEWS OF QOM & NISHAPUR IMAMS' SAHABEH ABOUT IMAMATE. JOURNAL OF HISTORICAL RESEARCHES (UNIVERSITY OF ISFAHAN)[Internet]. 2017;53(2 (34) ):31-50. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/148684/en

    IEEE: Copy

    MAJID SADEGHANI, MOHAMMAD ALI CHELONGAR, MOSTAFA PIRMORADIAN, and MOHSEN SAMADANIYAN, “A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE VIEWS OF QOM & NISHAPUR IMAMS' SAHABEH ABOUT IMAMATE,” JOURNAL OF HISTORICAL RESEARCHES (UNIVERSITY OF ISFAHAN), vol. 53, no. 2 (34) , pp. 31–50, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/148684/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button