مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

577
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

TYPOLOGY OF THE CONFRONTATION OF IRANIAN SOCIETY AFTER MONGOLS’ INVASION

Pages

  101-120

Abstract

 Entering Islamic territories in 616 AH, MONGOLS, led by Genghis Khan, caused outstanding changes in social and political occasions. Political, social and economic outcomes of this invasion were so highlighted that Islamic era in Iran is divided to two main times, i.e. pre and post Mongol raid eras. Those changes were so effective that diverted many social manifestations and basics of Iranian Islamic society. Of course, not all the changes could be causes by MONGOLS’ invasion, and MONGOLS’ raid was one side of the coin. The other side of those changes was made by Iranians themselves, no matter intentionally or by force, to keep their social lives. All those changes, which caused basic movements in Iranian society, could be referred as "Social Reversal" in Iran after Mongol invasion.Iranian society showed three types of reactions to this social reversal: cooperation, silence and OPPOSITION. Those who opposed had two approaches, i.e. Saver-oriented movements and FATIAN movements. Saver-oriented movements could be divided to three groups: Factitious Jalal-e-dins, Factitious Mahdies and those who expected Abbasid Kalifah come back again and save them. The three last mentioned saver-oriented movements all believed there will be a saver who will appear and will save all from oppression and outrage and inequity and finally all of them failed to turn into thorough movement due to lack of a coherent framed thought base and school. On the other hand, FATIAN movement, which enjoyed a cohesive rulebook and statute and was backed by Iranian elites, could afford more effective successes and became one of the main factors of Ilkhanid internal breakdown and then collapse.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    FAYAZ ANUSH, ABOLHASSAN, AZIMI ZAVAREH, NEDA, & ALLAHYARI, FEREYDON. (2018). TYPOLOGY OF THE CONFRONTATION OF IRANIAN SOCIETY AFTER MONGOLS’ INVASION. JOURNAL OF HISTORICAL RESEARCHES (UNIVERSITY OF ISFAHAN), 54 (NEW VOL 10)(2 (38) ), 101-120. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/148805/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    FAYAZ ANUSH ABOLHASSAN, AZIMI ZAVAREH NEDA, ALLAHYARI FEREYDON. TYPOLOGY OF THE CONFRONTATION OF IRANIAN SOCIETY AFTER MONGOLS’ INVASION. JOURNAL OF HISTORICAL RESEARCHES (UNIVERSITY OF ISFAHAN)[Internet]. 2018;54 (NEW VOL 10)(2 (38) ):101-120. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/148805/en

    IEEE: Copy

    ABOLHASSAN FAYAZ ANUSH, NEDA AZIMI ZAVAREH, and FEREYDON ALLAHYARI, “TYPOLOGY OF THE CONFRONTATION OF IRANIAN SOCIETY AFTER MONGOLS’ INVASION,” JOURNAL OF HISTORICAL RESEARCHES (UNIVERSITY OF ISFAHAN), vol. 54 (NEW VOL 10), no. 2 (38) , pp. 101–120, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/148805/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button