Methodology for Inferring Moral Priorities According to the Narrations of

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ghanavi Amir; Habibi Reza; Haghshenas Hamid Reza

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: RESEARCH QUARTERLY IN ISLAMIC ETHICS Year:2021 | Volume:14 | Issue:52 Page(s): 145-164

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Methodology for Inferring Moral Priorities According to the Narrations of "Afal Tafzil"

Author(s)

ghanavi Amir | Habibi Reza | Haghshenas Hamid Reza | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Considering the different levels of moral values in Islam

in order to know the most important values and also to eliminate the contradiction

it is necessary to deduce from the texts of verses and hadiths. One of the most important aspects in these texts

Abstract

Considering the different levels of moral values in Islam, in order to know the most important values and also to eliminate the contradiction, it is necessary to deduce from the texts of verses and hadiths. One of the most important aspects in these texts is the "structure of Tafzil". Some narrations of this structure indicate the priority of one or more values and others indicate a rule in determining the priority. The initial discrepancy between these narrations systematically raises the question of how to resolve the apparent discrepancy between them in order to deduce moral priorities based on these narrations. The research method in this article is descriptive-analytical which is based on the orbit of moral jurisprudence. Examining the regular narrations in the detailed structure shows that there is no inconsistency between them; some of them have a hierarchical precedence over others, and the others are in the same rank or have different statuses of a priority action or a prioritized action is explained in different terms.

Multimedia

No record.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans