COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF VIEWS ON URBAN PROJECTS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

FARHADI ROUDABEH

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Geography Year:2015 | Volume:13 | Issue:45 Page(s): 203-227

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

923

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF VIEWS ON URBAN PROJECTS

Author(s)

FARHADI ROUDABEH | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

HEALTHY URBAN PLANNINGQ2

COMMUNITY PARTICIPATIONQ1

VULNERABLE GROUPSQ2

URBAN PROBLEMSQ2

ACTIVITIES PRIORITIZINGQ2

Abstract

Nowadays in the design and implementation of urban projects emphasis to gaining of intersectoral coordination and COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION. But attracting COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION seems difficult without approaching the people and officials opinions. The main object of this research is the examination of existence or lack of significant difference between people and officials opinions about urban projects prioritization. For this purpose, people’s viewpoints were collected through 424 coincidental samples and it has been compared with viewpoints of 46 related officials with “Healthy Cities Projects” in Rey city (As one of the projects that is a consideration at the international level) in field of activities prioritization. The statistical analysis was performed using two multivariate ANOVA and nonparametric test of Friedman and U-Mann-Whitney test in SPSS environment. The results indicate that in case of activities levels on “Healthy Cities Projects”, there is a significant difference between people's and officials viewpoints. But, in field of prioritization investigating VULNERABLE GROUPS’ there isn’t a significant difference between viewpoints of people’s and officials. And in the field of urban issues to prioritize investigation also it requires additional discussion. In the end of article the solutions were proposed to better carry out the project.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

FARHADI, ROUDABEH. (2015). COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF VIEWS ON URBAN PROJECTS. GEOGRAPHY, 13(45), 203-227. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/150580/en

Vancouver: Copy

FARHADI ROUDABEH. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF VIEWS ON URBAN PROJECTS. GEOGRAPHY[Internet]. 2015;13(45):203-227. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/150580/en

IEEE: Copy

ROUDABEH FARHADI, “COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF VIEWS ON URBAN PROJECTS,” GEOGRAPHY, vol. 13, no. 45, pp. 203–227, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/150580/en

Related Journal Papers