مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

360
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Recognition of “ Other” in the Civilizational Debates and the Foundations of Foreign Policy in Russia

Pages

  307-324

Abstract

 This article seeks to recognize the “ other’ s” position in Russian civilizational thoughts. For centuries, Russia has participated in intense interactions among European, Asian and Middle Eastern regions, and it has developed a language and theories for relating to its various others. Studying Russian debates can help us in the task of reflecting on problematic epistemological assumptions behind the western dominant theories in political science studies, as well as clarifying their inefficiency in explaining the Self/Other dialectic. To understand both continuity and change in Russian civilizational debates, I draw some cases of Intellectual currents from imperial and post-soviet historical periods for analyzing their approaches toward Russian Other. The Russian Intellectual currents that have been studied in this framework include the following: Eurocentrism (both Westernizers and Slavophilies), Easterners, Eurasianists and Euro-Easterners. Although moving beyond viewing East/West interaction as a challenge to Russian thinkers, some of them have found ways to conceptualize the two cultural entities as in dialogue with one another and to Redefine Russian Identity. The research findings show that Russian civilizational thoughts is transforming to less-essentialism and to recognition of the others as dialogue counterpart. East has responded positively to this preparation, and on this basis constructive dialogues and partnerships have been formed in the form of bilateral or multilateral unions and agreements. On the other hand, the West has not shown a readiness for dialogue with Russia. Since, according to the theoretical framework of research, identity is continuously redefined in relation to others, the negative attitude of the West towards Russia can transform Russia's perception of the West and so disrupt dialogue process between the West and Russia.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    RASHIDI, AHMAD. (2018). Recognition of “ Other” in the Civilizational Debates and the Foundations of Foreign Policy in Russia. JOURNAL OF CENTRAL EURASIA STUDIES, 10(2 ), 307-324. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/151256/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    RASHIDI AHMAD. Recognition of “ Other” in the Civilizational Debates and the Foundations of Foreign Policy in Russia. JOURNAL OF CENTRAL EURASIA STUDIES[Internet]. 2018;10(2 ):307-324. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/151256/en

    IEEE: Copy

    AHMAD RASHIDI, “Recognition of “ Other” in the Civilizational Debates and the Foundations of Foreign Policy in Russia,” JOURNAL OF CENTRAL EURASIA STUDIES, vol. 10, no. 2 , pp. 307–324, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/151256/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button