مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

764
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF RIJALI VIEWS OF IBN AL-GHAZAERI AND AL-NAJJASHI

Pages

  85-112

Abstract

IBN AL-GHAZAERI and AL-NAJASHI are assumed to be rijal scholars of early era whose thoughts have undoubtedly affect onrijal scholars of late era. IBN AL-GHAZAERI was dependent to RIJALI VIEWs of Qom's HADITH NARRATORS. Analyzing their rijali perspectives indicates a sort of similarities between them. This point results from especially describing and introducing NARRATORS in his Kitab al-rijal. Meantime, cooperation of al-Najjashi and IBN AL-GHAZAERI and their use of NARRATORS such as Hossein Ibn Obeidallah al-Ghazaeri, the father of IBN AL-GHAZAERI, illustrates that they have similar views in terms of their rijali method and manner. Beside their identical views about substantial issues, we can point to the influence of IBN AL-GHAZAERI on AL-NAJASHI. Comparing these two rijali scholars on the basis of their significant works shows their approach to Ijtihad rather than their reliance on observation when stating rijali aspects of NARRATORS.In addition to their matching viewpoints such as their scholarly views, opposition with some Qomi NARRATORS, the difference between validity of narrator and their HADITH, AL-NAJASHI and IBN AL-GHAZAERI are similar in their citation of famous theory of JARH AND TA'DIL (disparagement and crediting of NARRATORS of HADITH). There also found to be some differences between these two scholars' ideas. Obvious instances of these differences can be found in their opposing RIJALI VIEWs. For example, IBN AL-GHAZAERI is strict in expression of RIJALI VIEWs which is formed on Qomi NARRATORS' RIJALI VIEWs, while al-Najjashi is more moderate even in disparagement of NARRATORS.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    QASEMPUR, MOHSEN. (2013). A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF RIJALI VIEWS OF IBN AL-GHAZAERI AND AL-NAJJASHI. HADITH STUDIES, 5(9), 85-112. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/151975/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    QASEMPUR MOHSEN. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF RIJALI VIEWS OF IBN AL-GHAZAERI AND AL-NAJJASHI. HADITH STUDIES[Internet]. 2013;5(9):85-112. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/151975/en

    IEEE: Copy

    MOHSEN QASEMPUR, “A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF RIJALI VIEWS OF IBN AL-GHAZAERI AND AL-NAJJASHI,” HADITH STUDIES, vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 85–112, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/151975/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button