مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

2,890
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

MISDIRECTION AND APPROVAL” ACCORDING TO AL-GHAZALI AND THE SHIITE JURISPRUDENTS

Pages

  111-130

Keywords

MISDIRECTION (TAKHTAAH)Q3
APPROVAL (TASWIB)Q3
“THE APPROVERS” (MUSAWWIBAH)Q2
“THE FALLIBILISTS” (MUKHATTIAH)Q2

Abstract

 One of the issues discussed in Shi‘ite jurisprudence in a comparative way is the question of “misdirection and approval” (takhta’ah wa taswib). On this point, Imamite Shi‘ite jurists held discussions with followers of Sunni schools, and each have taken positions that have become characteristic for both sides. The Ash‘arites and a small number of the Mu‘tazilites held that God has no verdict in this sensible world, but that God’s verdict is identical with the opinio communis reached by the authoritative experts. Hence, the experts in Islamic jurisprudence (the Mujtahids) never fail. This theory is labeled the “theory of approval” (taswib), and its followers are called “the approvers” (musawwibah). The followers of the contrary theory are called “the fallibilists” (mukhatti’ah), i.e. the theory hat holds that God does have verdicts in the real world and that the jurists might or might not find them, so that in the latter case they are indeed fallible.AL-GHAZALI, one of the outstanding patrons of the Ash‘arite school, is a stout defender of the “approval” theory. Apparently, this quarrel does not go back to the early centuries of the canonization of Islamic jurisprudence. It rather seems to have resulted from discussions that gained momentum in the circles of theologians, i.e. kalam theorists. Generally, the issue has more of a theological character rather than belonging to judicial discussions. In this regards, this paper discusses questions such as: What was the initial claim? What are the roots of the quarrel? And finally, what was actually troubling the mind of those who pursued the question?

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    MOHAQQIQ DAMAD, SEYYED MOSTAFA. (2009). MISDIRECTION AND APPROVAL” ACCORDING TO AL-GHAZALI AND THE SHIITE JURISPRUDENTS. THE JOURNAL OF SAPIENTIAL WISDOM AND PHILOSOPHY (SOPHIA PERENNIS), 6(2), 111-130. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/152784/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    MOHAQQIQ DAMAD SEYYED MOSTAFA. MISDIRECTION AND APPROVAL” ACCORDING TO AL-GHAZALI AND THE SHIITE JURISPRUDENTS. THE JOURNAL OF SAPIENTIAL WISDOM AND PHILOSOPHY (SOPHIA PERENNIS)[Internet]. 2009;6(2):111-130. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/152784/en

    IEEE: Copy

    SEYYED MOSTAFA MOHAQQIQ DAMAD, “MISDIRECTION AND APPROVAL” ACCORDING TO AL-GHAZALI AND THE SHIITE JURISPRUDENTS,” THE JOURNAL OF SAPIENTIAL WISDOM AND PHILOSOPHY (SOPHIA PERENNIS), vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 111–130, 2009, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/152784/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top