مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

992
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Proposing a criteria-based assessment pattern for architectural design studios

Pages

  441-458

Abstract

 Architecture education is one of the most important issues in the development of architecture. One of the important pillars of education is Evaluation. The crit is the most common assessment method and having feedback in architecture. In research on the crit, little attention was paid to the sense and reception of students from the process of Evaluation, while being recognized as one of the greatest student's dissatisfaction. The purpose of this research is to understand the students' viewpoints about the current methods of the crit, in addition of studying student designing capability, evaluate the design and process, in a way to judge architectural projects to improve the quality of arbitration and education in this field, And provides model for the correct measurement and judgment method, based on goals and Design Process, relying on criteria which are based on educational objectives. In this research, 40 undergraduate and postgraduate students at Sure university school of architecture were selected through cluster sampling as focus groups, And experts has been used to weight the criteria by AHP method. Among them, critical explanation with weight of 38% is more important, after that the development of the chosen idea with 21%, the concept and design solution, with 17% & 14% eventually the final design with 10% is the least important of the five criteria. The proposed model can provide strategies for practitioners of architecture education, such as lecturers and students to enhance their learning.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    Rezaei Ashtiani, sima, & Mahdinejad, Jamaledin. (2019). Proposing a criteria-based assessment pattern for architectural design studios. JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY OF EDUCATION (JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY AND EDUCATION), 13(3 ), 441-458. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/155376/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    Rezaei Ashtiani sima, Mahdinejad Jamaledin. Proposing a criteria-based assessment pattern for architectural design studios. JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY OF EDUCATION (JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY AND EDUCATION)[Internet]. 2019;13(3 ):441-458. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/155376/en

    IEEE: Copy

    sima Rezaei Ashtiani, and Jamaledin Mahdinejad, “Proposing a criteria-based assessment pattern for architectural design studios,” JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY OF EDUCATION (JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY AND EDUCATION), vol. 13, no. 3 , pp. 441–458, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/155376/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button