Sufism in the Analysis of a Discourse; the Treatise of Radd-i-Sufiya

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

AMINI IMAN; PAZOUKI SHAHRAM

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: TARIKH WA TAMADDUN-I ISLAMI Year:2019 | Volume:15 | Issue:29 Page(s): 167-203

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

486

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Sufism in the Analysis of a Discourse; the Treatise of Radd-i-Sufiya

Author(s)

AMINI IMAN | PAZOUKI SHAHRAM | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Anti-SufismQ1

Mulla Mohammad Taher QomiQ1

SafavidQ2

AkhbarisQ1

Abstract

As the Safavid kings determined to confined the Sufis of Qizilbash power and using Shari'a for obtaining legitimacy, the raddiah (refutation) texts of some jurisprudents against Sufism also have grown significantly in the second half of the Safavid era. One of the influential Ikhbari jurisprudents was Mulla Taher Qomi, who by writing many dissertations in opposition to Sufism is also considered as the most prolific raddiah writers. This paper, by using Van Leeuwen and Laclau Mouffe's analysis patterns, explores linguistic propositions and disclose discourse constructions of one of those controversial texts, Radd-i-sufiya. The paper indicates that the author, from the point of view of his superior argument, Shia and Sharia of Islam, is against the rival discourse around the central point of tariqah and haqiqah, and thus, with the misunderstanding and diminution of semantic elements of discourse, introduce Sufism as non-Islamic and sometimes originated from the Sunnite. These pretensions and the intensification of otherness between the two discourses had a profound effect on subsequent hegemonic interventions, especially during the Qajar period. Hegemony with the means of force gave certainty and unambiguity in conflicts to the Sufi discourse. As a result of this intervention, formally, Sufism and any mystic recitations of religion was marginalized in public discourse, and the formalist discourse was the dominant discourse of the religious understanding in the society.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

AMINI, IMAN, & PAZOUKI, SHAHRAM. (2019). Sufism in the Analysis of a Discourse; the Treatise of Radd-i-Sufiya. TARIKH WA TAMADDUN-I ISLAMI, 15(29 ), 167-203. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/157250/en

Vancouver: Copy

AMINI IMAN, PAZOUKI SHAHRAM. Sufism in the Analysis of a Discourse; the Treatise of Radd-i-Sufiya. TARIKH WA TAMADDUN-I ISLAMI[Internet]. 2019;15(29 ):167-203. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/157250/en

IEEE: Copy

IMAN AMINI, and SHAHRAM PAZOUKI, “Sufism in the Analysis of a Discourse; the Treatise of Radd-i-Sufiya,” TARIKH WA TAMADDUN-I ISLAMI, vol. 15, no. 29 , pp. 167–203, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/157250/en

Related Journal Papers