NECESSARY CONCLUSIONS IN MOODS WITH ONLY ONE NECESSARY PREMISE A PROBLEM IN ARISTOTELIAN MODAL SYLLOGISM

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

NABATI F.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: RESEARCH ON METAPHYSIK Year:2010 | Volume:45 | Issue:3-4 Page(s): 25-41

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

783

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

NECESSARY CONCLUSIONS IN MOODS WITH ONLY ONE NECESSARY PREMISE A PROBLEM IN ARISTOTELIAN MODAL SYLLOGISM

Author(s)

NABATI F. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

MODAL SYLLOGISMQ3

NECESSITYQ3

SPACEQ2

DE DICTOQ3

"TWO BARBARAS" PROBLEMQ3

Abstract

There are many criticisms about Aristotelian MODAL SYLLOGISM. Some logicians tried to provide adequate formulation of his total system but they were not successful. Therefore some logicians decided to account for those parts of the system which had been more controversial. The most controversial of the system is the "TWO BARBARAS" PROBLEM. The problem is about Aristotle's claim that moods with necessary major premise and assertoric minor premise have necessary conclusion while moods with assertoric major premise and necessary minor premise do not have necessary conclusion. Some logicians accept this, some believe that both of them have necessary conclusion, and some believe that both of them have assertoric conclusion. Rescher defended Aristotle's idea rather successfully. Moreover he thereby showed the consistency of this account with other parts of Aristotle's logic.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

NABATI, F.. (2010). NECESSARY CONCLUSIONS IN MOODS WITH ONLY ONE NECESSARY PREMISE A PROBLEM IN ARISTOTELIAN MODAL SYLLOGISM. RESEARCH ON METAPHYSIK, 45(3-4), 25-41. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/157407/en

Vancouver: Copy

NABATI F.. NECESSARY CONCLUSIONS IN MOODS WITH ONLY ONE NECESSARY PREMISE A PROBLEM IN ARISTOTELIAN MODAL SYLLOGISM. RESEARCH ON METAPHYSIK[Internet]. 2010;45(3-4):25-41. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/157407/en

IEEE: Copy

F. NABATI, “NECESSARY CONCLUSIONS IN MOODS WITH ONLY ONE NECESSARY PREMISE A PROBLEM IN ARISTOTELIAN MODAL SYLLOGISM,” RESEARCH ON METAPHYSIK, vol. 45, no. 3-4, pp. 25–41, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/157407/en

Related Journal Papers