AN IN-LINE CONSIDERATION OF RATIONALISM IN THE WORKS OF SEYYED HUSSAIN NASR AND RICHARD RORTY

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ALAVI SEYYED MOHAMMAD KAZEM; SADEGHIMANESH ZAHRA

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: RESEARCH ON METAPHYSIK Year:2016 | Volume:52 | Issue:21 Page(s): 71-89

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

640

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

AN IN-LINE CONSIDERATION OF RATIONALISM IN THE WORKS OF SEYYED HUSSAIN NASR AND RICHARD RORTY

Author(s)

ALAVI SEYYED MOHAMMAD KAZEM | SADEGHIMANESH ZAHRA | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

RATIONALITYQ2

SEYYED HUSSAIN NASRQ1

RICHARD RORTYQ1

TRADITIONALISMQ2

NEO-PRAGMATISMQ3

THE SACRED SCIENCEQ1

CORRELATIONQ2

Abstract

Richard Rorty, who is a new-pragmatist and anti-essentialist philosopher, and Seyyed Hossein Nasr, who is a traditionalist, are both of the prominent thought leaders in contemporary philosophy. Having challenged the RATIONALITY foundations and criteria in modern philosophy, especially the criteria which expand the scientific RATIONALITY day by day, they intend to expand RATIONALITY based on their own philosophic views in other areas including literature, art, and humanities. A careful studying of similar and different aspects of Nasr and Rorty’s philosophic opinions about RATIONALITY and criticizing them lead to understanding the limitations and shortcomings of modern philosophy as far as the concept of RATIONALITY is concerned, the ones which need to be changed, expanded, or moderated. Changing and moderating Nasr’s views is carried out through focusing on timeless and eternal aspects of man, and reaching the absolute truth to other sciences. Regarding Rorty’s philosophy, the same thing is happening by focusing on time and historical aspects, by creating CORRELATION and democratic relations among all the men. Despite the fact that Nasr and Rorty’s views have fundamental differences, they have been the key to solving many problems in contemporary philosophy by revealing the damages of modern RATIONALITY.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

ALAVI, SEYYED MOHAMMAD KAZEM, & SADEGHIMANESH, ZAHRA. (2016). AN IN-LINE CONSIDERATION OF RATIONALISM IN THE WORKS OF SEYYED HUSSAIN NASR AND RICHARD RORTY. RESEARCH ON METAPHYSIK, 52(21 ), 71-89. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/157487/en

Vancouver: Copy

ALAVI SEYYED MOHAMMAD KAZEM, SADEGHIMANESH ZAHRA. AN IN-LINE CONSIDERATION OF RATIONALISM IN THE WORKS OF SEYYED HUSSAIN NASR AND RICHARD RORTY. RESEARCH ON METAPHYSIK[Internet]. 2016;52(21 ):71-89. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/157487/en

IEEE: Copy

SEYYED MOHAMMAD KAZEM ALAVI, and ZAHRA SADEGHIMANESH, “AN IN-LINE CONSIDERATION OF RATIONALISM IN THE WORKS OF SEYYED HUSSAIN NASR AND RICHARD RORTY,” RESEARCH ON METAPHYSIK, vol. 52, no. 21 , pp. 71–89, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/157487/en

Related Journal Papers