CRITICIZING AND RETHINKING THE PERIODIZATION OF LITERARY HISTORY

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SARLI NASER GHOLI

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: LITERARY CRITICISM Year:2013 | Volume:6 | Issue:23 Page(s): 11-36

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,196

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

CRITICIZING AND RETHINKING THE PERIODIZATION OF LITERARY HISTORY

Author(s)

SARLI NASER GHOLI | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

LITERARY HISTORYQ2

PERIODIZATIONQ2

LITERARY CRITICISMQ2

LITERARY THEORYQ2

Abstract

In historical and literary studies, PERIODIZATION is a regulative idea for classifying the literary and historical information on diachronic axis.This has been the subject of some criticism in the literary studies.This article studies the critical debates about PERIODIZATION in LITERARY HISTORY and the rethinking of the concept. We can divide these critical debates into two groups: (1) some critics call the very notion of PERIODIZATION into question; and (2) others engage in rethinking and revising the concept for appropriate application in LITERARY HISTORY.Imposition of a static framework on cultural and literary dynamics, homogenizing effect which stands in contrast with the uniqueness of literary works, mixing the histories of different literary genres, lack of conformity with reality, artificial homogeneity of the schemas of change and evolution, problems of terminology, anachronism, overlooking years and even centuries, disregarding the distance between literary production and literary reading, ignoring ethnic and gender groups, and dominance of PERIODIZATION framework over critical thought are some of the problems of the current approach to PERIODIZATION in LITERARY HISTORY. Rethinking PERIODIZATION should be based on new historical and literary approaches such as feminism or ethnic minorities’ studies.

Cites

No record.

References

تکامل یک تصویر

Cite

APA: Copy

SARLI, NASER GHOLI. (2013). CRITICIZING AND RETHINKING THE PERIODIZATION OF LITERARY HISTORY. LITERARY CRITICISM, 6(23), 11-36. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/158197/en

Vancouver: Copy

SARLI NASER GHOLI. CRITICIZING AND RETHINKING THE PERIODIZATION OF LITERARY HISTORY. LITERARY CRITICISM[Internet]. 2013;6(23):11-36. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/158197/en

IEEE: Copy

NASER GHOLI SARLI, “CRITICIZING AND RETHINKING THE PERIODIZATION OF LITERARY HISTORY,” LITERARY CRITICISM, vol. 6, no. 23, pp. 11–36, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/158197/en

Related Journal Papers