مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

488
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A New Model for Measuring of Democracy, According to Critiques on Current Models

Pages

  53-78

Abstract

Democracy has been defined and measured in various ways. There is no consensus on how to measure Democracy, definitions of Democracy are contested and there is an ongoing lively debate on the subject. In this thesis we identify the current measuring model of Democracy and address the strengths and weaknesses of the main available measures of political regime and extend a new model. We argue that existing measures of Democracy are not interchangeable and that the choice of measure should be guided by its theoretical and empirical underpinnings. The method in this thesis is documentary studies. We use all related documents and fallow three steps: description, analysis and critique, proposition. Munck and Verkuilen design a framework for measuring Democracy. The framework first distinguishes among three challenges that are sequentially addressed: conceptualization, measurement, and aggregation, In conceptualization, author's model is based on five categories: election, political participation, civil and political freedom, rule of law and economical welfare. The five categories are interrelated and form a coherent conceptual whole. In measurement and aggregation, author proposes two approaches: data oriented and expert oriented. They need to calculation of factor loading by multiple regressions. Finally, we use weight sum and calculate Democracy scores in different countries.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    Brandgi, Badri, & GHASEMI, VAHID. (2016). A New Model for Measuring of Democracy, According to Critiques on Current Models. JOURNAL OF POLITICAL STUDIES, 8(32 ), 53-78. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/161375/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    Brandgi Badri, GHASEMI VAHID. A New Model for Measuring of Democracy, According to Critiques on Current Models. JOURNAL OF POLITICAL STUDIES[Internet]. 2016;8(32 ):53-78. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/161375/en

    IEEE: Copy

    Badri Brandgi, and VAHID GHASEMI, “A New Model for Measuring of Democracy, According to Critiques on Current Models,” JOURNAL OF POLITICAL STUDIES, vol. 8, no. 32 , pp. 53–78, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/161375/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button