THE EFFECT OF CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF DISCOURSAL AND META DISCOURSAL ASPECTS OF WRITING: WRITTEN VS. ORAL FEEDBACK

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ZAND MOGHADAM AMIR; Abbasalizadeh Mahnaz

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: LANGUAGE RELATED RESEARCH (COMPARATIVE LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE RESEARCH) Year:2015 | Volume:6 | Issue:3 (24) Page(s): 141-164

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

663

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE EFFECT OF CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF DISCOURSAL AND META DISCOURSAL ASPECTS OF WRITING: WRITTEN VS. ORAL FEEDBACK

Author(s)

ZAND MOGHADAM AMIR | Abbasalizadeh Mahnaz | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

DISCOURSAL FEATURESQ1

METADISCOURSE MARKERSQ2

CORRECTIVE FEEDBACKQ2

ORAL FEEDBACKQ2

WRITTEN FEEDBACKQ2

Abstract

Given the fact that CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK has been proved to have a positive impact on the acquisition and development of second/foreign language, the aim of the present study was to investigate and compare the effect of oral and written CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK on the development of discoursal and metadiscoursal aspects of Iranian EFL learners ‘writing. To this end, a total of 67 intermediate learners were selected, homogenized, and given a pre-test of writing. Then, written and oral metalinguistic CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK on coherence, cohesion, and METADISCOURSE MARKERS were given to the first and second group respectively. At the end, the two groups were given a post-test.The results of the study showed that the group which received oral metalinguistic feedback, compared with the WRITTEN FEEDBACK group, could have a better writing performance as far as discoursal and metaDISCOURSAL FEATURES of writing are concerned. It was also shown that transition markers and engagement markers were the most and the least frequent discourse markers among the two groups. It can be concluded that ORAL FEEDBACK has a significant effect on EFL leaners’ writing ability, as far as discoursal and metaDISCOURSAL FEATURES are concerned. This study has implications for language instructors as well as language researchers.

Cites

A REVIEW OF FEEDBACK IN MIDWIFERY EDUCATION

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

ZAND MOGHADAM, AMIR,. (2015). THE EFFECT OF CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF DISCOURSAL AND META DISCOURSAL ASPECTS OF WRITING: WRITTEN VS. ORAL FEEDBACK. LANGUAGE RELATED RESEARCH (COMPARATIVE LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE RESEARCH), 6(3 (24)), 141-164. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/166003/en

Vancouver: Copy

ZAND MOGHADAM AMIR. THE EFFECT OF CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF DISCOURSAL AND META DISCOURSAL ASPECTS OF WRITING: WRITTEN VS. ORAL FEEDBACK. LANGUAGE RELATED RESEARCH (COMPARATIVE LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE RESEARCH)[Internet]. 2015;6(3 (24)):141-164. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/166003/en

IEEE: Copy

AMIR ZAND MOGHADAM, an, “THE EFFECT OF CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF DISCOURSAL AND META DISCOURSAL ASPECTS OF WRITING: WRITTEN VS. ORAL FEEDBACK,” LANGUAGE RELATED RESEARCH (COMPARATIVE LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE RESEARCH), vol. 6, no. 3 (24), pp. 141–164, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/166003/en

Related Journal Papers