A Deliberation on the Agreement between Shams Tabrizi’ s and Muhammad Ghazali’ s Ideas on Kalam

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

KHODADADI MOHAMMAD; MOHAMADI ASKARABADI FATEME

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Comparative Literature Year:2018 | Volume:10 | Issue:18 Page(s): 53-72

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

579

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A Deliberation on the Agreement between Shams Tabrizi’ s and Muhammad Ghazali’ s Ideas on Kalam

Author(s)

KHODADADI MOHAMMAD | MOHAMADI ASKARABADI FATEME | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Mystical literatureQ2

Ilm al-kalamQ2

Shams TabriziQ2

Imam Muhammad GhazaliQ2

Abstract

In discussions about kalam, usually the cases in which the viewpoints of a speaker and a well-known mystic and scholar are in complete accordance with each other are almost very rare. There are significant similarities between Imam Muhammad Ghazali’ s and Shams Tabrizi’ s verbal ideas that have been unnoticed from the sight of researchers and have remained understudied. In this study, the researchers have enumerated their views of kalam and then determined their accordance with each other. One of the findings of this study is the indication of the accordance of Shams’ s and Ghazali’ s thoughts about “ faith” with each other, as both of them have valued faith in heart over faith in words, and basically, in higher level, count that as acceptance in heart. Moreover, they both believe that there is no direct relationship between faith and miracle, but that true faith relies on having special qualifications. Also, in the discussion of “ predestination and free will” , they have widely criticized the arguments of both absolute determinists and libertarians, pursuing a way to build the basis of their own system of thought. Furthermore, in the discussion of “ temporality and eternity” considering the nature and attributes of God, neither of them believe in any separation between the nature of God and his attributes. Also, about “ vision” of God, they both try to prove this claim that vision of God does not entail any quantification or embodiment for the holy nature of God.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

KHODADADI, MOHAMMAD, & MOHAMADI ASKARABADI, FATEME. (2018). A Deliberation on the Agreement between Shams Tabrizi’ s and Muhammad Ghazali’ s Ideas on Kalam. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE LITERATURE, 10(18 ), 53-72. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/167085/en

Vancouver: Copy

KHODADADI MOHAMMAD, MOHAMADI ASKARABADI FATEME. A Deliberation on the Agreement between Shams Tabrizi’ s and Muhammad Ghazali’ s Ideas on Kalam. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE LITERATURE[Internet]. 2018;10(18 ):53-72. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/167085/en

IEEE: Copy

MOHAMMAD KHODADADI, and FATEME MOHAMADI ASKARABADI, “A Deliberation on the Agreement between Shams Tabrizi’ s and Muhammad Ghazali’ s Ideas on Kalam,” JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE LITERATURE, vol. 10, no. 18 , pp. 53–72, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/167085/en

Related Journal Papers