COMPARISON OF TWO APPROACHES FOR MEASURING MORAL DEVELOPMENT: NEO-KOHLBERGIAN APPROACH AND MORAL STUDY CHALLENGES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

HOOSHYARI ZAHRA; DELAVAR ALI; MINAEI ASGHAR; ESKANDARI HOSSEIN

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology Year:2018 | Volume:24 | Issue:1 Page(s): 30-42

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

983

Download:

660

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF TWO APPROACHES FOR MEASURING MORAL DEVELOPMENT: NEO-KOHLBERGIAN APPROACH AND MORAL STUDY CHALLENGES

Author(s)

HOOSHYARI ZAHRA | DELAVAR ALI | MINAEI ASGHAR | ESKANDARI HOSSEIN | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

DEFINING ISSUE TESTQ1

SOCIOMORAL REFLECTION MEASURE- SHORT FORMQ1

MORAL JUDGMENT INTERVIEWQ1

HYPOTHETICAL DILEMMASQ1

IN-DEPTH INTERVIEWQ1

Abstract

Objectives A few of the challenges involved in measuring moral development includes tools and methodology. The present study compared two neo-Kohlbergian approaches in the study of moral development.MethodsA total of 40 peoples referred to the Center for Behavioral and Mental Health Assessment were selected as a sample group, subjected to QUAN-QUAL (equal) design, and assessed using DEFINING ISSUE TEST (DIT), Sociomoral Reflection Measure-Short Form (SRM-SF), semi-structured interviews based on hypothetical moral dilemmas, and IN-DEPTH INTERVIEWs based on real-life dilemmas.ResultsThe results showed that DIT and SRM-SF scores were correlated in the moral maturity index; however, these two methods and the results of conflicts in real life exhibited significant differences.ConclusionTherefore, standards and instructions were applied to both methods including test based on the memory or recalling that would yield similar results. Furthermore, the difference between these two methods with respect to results and interviews based on real-life dilemmas might be dependent on the situation of the individual than the tools, making self-judgment easier for individuals.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

HOOSHYARI, ZAHRA, DELAVAR, ALI, MINAEI, ASGHAR, & ESKANDARI, HOSSEIN. (2018). COMPARISON OF TWO APPROACHES FOR MEASURING MORAL DEVELOPMENT: NEO-KOHLBERGIAN APPROACH AND MORAL STUDY CHALLENGES. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 24(1 ), 30-42. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/16760/en

Vancouver: Copy

HOOSHYARI ZAHRA, DELAVAR ALI, MINAEI ASGHAR, ESKANDARI HOSSEIN. COMPARISON OF TWO APPROACHES FOR MEASURING MORAL DEVELOPMENT: NEO-KOHLBERGIAN APPROACH AND MORAL STUDY CHALLENGES. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY[Internet]. 2018;24(1 ):30-42. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/16760/en

IEEE: Copy

ZAHRA HOOSHYARI, ALI DELAVAR, ASGHAR MINAEI, and HOSSEIN ESKANDARI, “COMPARISON OF TWO APPROACHES FOR MEASURING MORAL DEVELOPMENT: NEO-KOHLBERGIAN APPROACH AND MORAL STUDY CHALLENGES,” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, vol. 24, no. 1 , pp. 30–42, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/16760/en

Related Journal Papers