COMPARISON OF WOUND DISRUPTION BETWEEN THREE METHODS: CLOSURE OF SUBCUTANEOUS WITH POLYGLYCOLIC VERSUS CLOSURE OF SUBCUTANEOUS WITH PLAIN AND NON-CLOSURE AFTER CESAREAN SECTION

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

NASR ELAHI SH.; RADNIA N.; GHAFELEHBASHI M.S.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Avicenna Journal of Clinical Medicine Year:2007 | Volume:14 | Issue:2 (SN 44) Page(s): 35-39

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,272

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF WOUND DISRUPTION BETWEEN THREE METHODS: CLOSURE OF SUBCUTANEOUS WITH POLYGLYCOLIC VERSUS CLOSURE OF SUBCUTANEOUS WITH PLAIN AND NON-CLOSURE AFTER CESAREAN SECTION

Author(s)

NASR ELAHI SH. | RADNIA N. | GHAFELEHBASHI M.S. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

CESAREAN SECTIONQ3

INCISIONAL DISRUPTIONQ3

WOUND INFECTIONQ3

Abstract

Introduction & Objective: Complication of cesarean incision such as infection and disruption can involve the life quality of the patients and also can lead to recurrent physician visit, usually re-hospitalization and re-operation. This study designed to compare the wound disruption between three methods: closure of subcutaneous with polyglycolic, plain and nonclosure after CESAREAN SECTION.Materials & Methods: This study was a clinicaltrial on 690 women underwent CESAREAN SECTION at Fatemieh hospital, Hamadan during 2004-2005. Inclusion criteria were: women with subcutaneous thickness more than 2cm and singleton pregnancy who underwent CESAREAN SECTION in any cause. Women with risk factors for wound disruption such as PROM (more than 18 hours), time of surgery longer than 90 minutes, vertical incision, administration of corticosteroid and immunosuppressive agents, having chronic systemic diseases including diabetes mellitus and immunodeficiency were excluded. The patients were randomly divided into 3groups: closure of subcutaneous with plain, polyglycolic sutures, and non-closure of subcutaneous. All patients received three doses of prophylactic antibiotic (cephazolin). The patients were evaluated for the WOUND INFECTION and disruption during hospitalization and first week after surgery. Data such as age, parity, gestational age, duration of surgery were extracted from medical records.Results: The wound disruption were 7%, 2.6% and 0.9% in plain, polygylcolicand non-closure groups respectively, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). WOUND INFECTION was found in 2 patients who belonged to plain closure group. Differences of WOUND INFECTION statistically were not significant between three groups (P>0.05).Conclusion: This study showed that subcutaneous closure in patients underwent CESAREAN SECTION will not increase the rate of wound disruption, where as subcutaneous closure with plain suture increase the rate of wound dehiscence versus closure with polyglycolic suture and non-closure of subcutaneous.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

NASR ELAHI, SH., RADNIA, N., & GHAFELEHBASHI, M.S.. (2007). COMPARISON OF WOUND DISRUPTION BETWEEN THREE METHODS: CLOSURE OF SUBCUTANEOUS WITH POLYGLYCOLIC VERSUS CLOSURE OF SUBCUTANEOUS WITH PLAIN AND NON-CLOSURE AFTER CESAREAN SECTION. AVICENNA JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE (SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF HAMADAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES AND HEALTH SERVICES), 14(2 (SN 44)), 35-39. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/17245/en

Vancouver: Copy

NASR ELAHI SH., RADNIA N., GHAFELEHBASHI M.S.. COMPARISON OF WOUND DISRUPTION BETWEEN THREE METHODS: CLOSURE OF SUBCUTANEOUS WITH POLYGLYCOLIC VERSUS CLOSURE OF SUBCUTANEOUS WITH PLAIN AND NON-CLOSURE AFTER CESAREAN SECTION. AVICENNA JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE (SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF HAMADAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES AND HEALTH SERVICES)[Internet]. 2007;14(2 (SN 44)):35-39. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/17245/en

IEEE: Copy

SH. NASR ELAHI, N. RADNIA, and M.S. GHAFELEHBASHI, “COMPARISON OF WOUND DISRUPTION BETWEEN THREE METHODS: CLOSURE OF SUBCUTANEOUS WITH POLYGLYCOLIC VERSUS CLOSURE OF SUBCUTANEOUS WITH PLAIN AND NON-CLOSURE AFTER CESAREAN SECTION,” AVICENNA JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE (SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF HAMADAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES AND HEALTH SERVICES), vol. 14, no. 2 (SN 44), pp. 35–39, 2007, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/17245/en

Related Journal Papers