مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

2,314
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF FIGURES OF SPEECH IN POEMS BY HOSSEIN MONZAVI AND GHEISAR AMINPOUR

Pages

  167-196

Abstract

 The pertinence of a poet’s imagination in ordinary concepts of life and their relationship with nature is due to his or her insights and knowledge of natural phenomena as well as the outside world. In the collection of works of every poet, all various types of IMAGERY being attributable to FIGURES OF SPEECH (i.e., METAPHOR, SIMILE, synecdoche, and irony) represent moments that deal with the poet’s inner world; in fact, they are the reflections of the poet’s soul, personality, and inner characteristics. The current study was an attempt to scrutinize FIGURES OF SPEECH and their frequency of use in Aminpour’s and Monzavi’s poems to find out the poets’ thoughts, emotions, and ideology towards the world and life. The common shared imageries or the central poetical imageries of these two poets were around love and the issues surrounding it. Although, more or less, a reflection of the society and the social issues could be seen in their writings, their subject was mostly about love. Their poetical imageries were vivid, dynamic, and visual. Although even little imitations could be discernible in their poems, their imageries and FIGURES OF SPEECH domains were not just limited to the imageries of traditional poetry, but innovations could be observed in their poems. SIMILEs were mostly intense and intuitive-intangible, and METAPHOR and SIMILE were used more frequently than the other FIGURES OF SPEECH.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    MORTAZAVI, SEYYED JAMALEDDIN, & NAJAFI BEHZADI, SAJAD. (2011). A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF FIGURES OF SPEECH IN POEMS BY HOSSEIN MONZAVI AND GHEISAR AMINPOUR. PERSIAN LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE (JOURNAL OF THE FACULTY OF LITERATURE AND HUMANITIES), 19(70 (15)), 167-196. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/173400/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    MORTAZAVI SEYYED JAMALEDDIN, NAJAFI BEHZADI SAJAD. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF FIGURES OF SPEECH IN POEMS BY HOSSEIN MONZAVI AND GHEISAR AMINPOUR. PERSIAN LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE (JOURNAL OF THE FACULTY OF LITERATURE AND HUMANITIES)[Internet]. 2011;19(70 (15)):167-196. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/173400/en

    IEEE: Copy

    SEYYED JAMALEDDIN MORTAZAVI, and SAJAD NAJAFI BEHZADI, “A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF FIGURES OF SPEECH IN POEMS BY HOSSEIN MONZAVI AND GHEISAR AMINPOUR,” PERSIAN LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE (JOURNAL OF THE FACULTY OF LITERATURE AND HUMANITIES), vol. 19, no. 70 (15), pp. 167–196, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/173400/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button