COMPARISON OF RESULTS AND COMPLICATIONS OF EXTERNAL D.C.R WITH ENDOSCOPIC D.C.R IN PRIMARY NASOLACRIMAL DUCT OBSTRUCTION

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SAMAVATI M.; FARAAHANI F.; MANI KASHANI KH.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Avicenna Journal of Clinical Medicine Year:2005 | Volume:12 | Issue:2 (SN 36) Page(s): 17-21

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

926

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF RESULTS AND COMPLICATIONS OF EXTERNAL D.C.R WITH ENDOSCOPIC D.C.R IN PRIMARY NASOLACRIMAL DUCT OBSTRUCTION

Author(s)

SAMAVATI M. | FARAAHANI F. | MANI KASHANI KH. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

DACRYOCYSTORHINOSTOMYQ3

NASOLACRIMAL DUCTQ3

SURGERY-METHODSQ3

Abstract

Introduction & Objective: Epiphora is one of the most common problems in the primary adult NASOLACRIMAL DUCT obstruction (PANDO). The surgical treatment of epiphora is DACRYOCYSTORHINOSTOMY (DCR) which is performed in two methods: External and Endonasal.Materials & Methods: In this prospective randomized clinical trial study, results and complications of these two methods were compared in Emam Khomeiny Hospital of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences during 2001-2002. Total cases of PANDO were 50 which was divided in two groups randomly. After surgery all patients were followed for 6 to 12 months.Results: In 92% of both groups, epiphora were resolved clinically, but in 16% of external and 8% of endonasal groups obstruction was seen in irrigation test (P>0.05).In the first week after surgery, all patients of endonasal group and 76% of external group were pain free. Nasal discharge in endoscopic group was significantly higher than external group.Conclusion: In conclusion although the results of these two methods were similar, external OCR remains the procedure of choice in treatment of NLD obstruction.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

SAMAVATI, M., FARAAHANI, F., & MANI KASHANI, KH.. (2005). COMPARISON OF RESULTS AND COMPLICATIONS OF EXTERNAL D.C.R WITH ENDOSCOPIC D.C.R IN PRIMARY NASOLACRIMAL DUCT OBSTRUCTION. AVICENNA JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE (SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF HAMADAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES AND HEALTH SERVICES), 12(2 (SN 36)), 17-21. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/17668/en

Vancouver: Copy

SAMAVATI M., FARAAHANI F., MANI KASHANI KH.. COMPARISON OF RESULTS AND COMPLICATIONS OF EXTERNAL D.C.R WITH ENDOSCOPIC D.C.R IN PRIMARY NASOLACRIMAL DUCT OBSTRUCTION. AVICENNA JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE (SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF HAMADAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES AND HEALTH SERVICES)[Internet]. 2005;12(2 (SN 36)):17-21. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/17668/en

IEEE: Copy

M. SAMAVATI, F. FARAAHANI, and KH. MANI KASHANI, “COMPARISON OF RESULTS AND COMPLICATIONS OF EXTERNAL D.C.R WITH ENDOSCOPIC D.C.R IN PRIMARY NASOLACRIMAL DUCT OBSTRUCTION,” AVICENNA JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE (SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF HAMADAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES AND HEALTH SERVICES), vol. 12, no. 2 (SN 36), pp. 17–21, 2005, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/17668/en

Related Journal Papers