NECESSITY OF RE-EDITING KIMIA-YE SA'ADAT

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SAKET SALMAN; YAHAGHI MOHAMMAD JAFAR; RASHED MOHASEL MOHAMMAD REZA; ABEDI MAHMOUD

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

2,395

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

NECESSITY OF RE-EDITING KIMIA-YE SA'ADAT

Author(s)

SAKET SALMAN | YAHAGHI MOHAMMAD JAFAR | RASHED MOHASEL MOHAMMAD REZA | ABEDI MAHMOUD | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

KIMIAQ2

YE SA'ADATQ2

ABU HAMED MOHAMMAD GHAZZALIQ2

KHADIV JAMQ2

ARAMQ2

EDITING TEXTSQ2

CODICOLOGYQ2

Abstract

KIMIA-ye Sa'adat is the most important work of ABU HAMED MOHAMMAD GHAZZALI in Persian which has been edited and published twice in Iran: the first time in 1940/1319 S by Ahmad ARAM, and the second time in 1982/1361 S By Hossein KHADIV JAM who had already published the first half of the book in 1976/1355 S. This article seeks to study these two editions, especially the one by KHADIV JAM, and compare them with the old manuscripts of the book. The study further indicates the shortcomings of the two editions and suggests the necessity for re-editing the work. Besides the original manuscripts used by KHADIV JAM, the study uses the manuscript in Malek Museum (dated 605 A.H.), two manuscripts from British Museum (dated 644 A.H. and 672 A.H.), and the newly found manuscript of Uppsala (dated 619 A.H.). The article refers to some of the most significant problems in the two existing editions especially the one by KHADIV JAM. Among the most noticeable shortcomings are the following: insufficiently introducing the manuscripts, careless selection of the original manuscript(s), adopting vague and uncritical methods for editing, deletions, unsupported additions, and some obvious mistakes in editing strange and rare vocabulary. These problems are so fundamental that in certain parts they cause serious semantic changes which depart drastically from the writer’s supposed intention.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

SAKET, SALMAN, YAHAGHI, MOHAMMAD JAFAR, RASHED MOHASEL, MOHAMMAD REZA, & ABEDI, MAHMOUD. (2012). NECESSITY OF RE-EDITING KIMIA-YE SA'ADAT. NEW LITERARY STUDIES, 45(3 (178)), 29-55. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/185374/en

Vancouver: Copy

SAKET SALMAN, YAHAGHI MOHAMMAD JAFAR, RASHED MOHASEL MOHAMMAD REZA, ABEDI MAHMOUD. NECESSITY OF RE-EDITING KIMIA-YE SA'ADAT. NEW LITERARY STUDIES[Internet]. 2012;45(3 (178)):29-55. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/185374/en

IEEE: Copy

SALMAN SAKET, MOHAMMAD JAFAR YAHAGHI, MOHAMMAD REZA RASHED MOHASEL, and MAHMOUD ABEDI, “NECESSITY OF RE-EDITING KIMIA-YE SA'ADAT,” NEW LITERARY STUDIES, vol. 45, no. 3 (178), pp. 29–55, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/185374/en

Related Journal Papers