مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,726
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A CRITIQUE OF METHODOLOGISM FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF GADAMER’S PHILOSOPHICAL HERMENEUTICS

Pages

  9-30

Abstract

 Gadamer’s CRITIQUE OF METHODOLOGISM is one of the fundamental teachings of his PHILOSOPHICAL HERMENEUTICS. GADAMER sees TRUTH much beyond the ability of method to grasp it completely. He criticizes the exclusive restriction of TRUTH in methodical processes but does not reject the need for methodical work. The present article explores the origins of methodologism in ancient Greece and modern times, and studies GADAMER’s review on the extra-methodical thoughts of Greek philosophers. Then, the following issues are articulated: GADAMER’s phenomenological critique on Cartesian subjectivism, and Kantian epistemology, and the methodologism of classical hermeneutics including the separation of subject and object and the failure of methodologism in accomplishing academic goals and the inability to get to the whole TRUTH and its inner contradictions. GADAMER finds a wrong understanding of logic and a lack of knowledge about its limitations and the boundaries of its capabilities as one of the causes for misconceptions about method and inappropriate expectations from methodologism, including the attainment of TRUTH. And in its critique he reaches back to the Greek roots of methodologism and distinguishes between scientific logic and philosophical logic in the dichotomy of Apollonian and Dionysian ideas among Stoic philosophers and the followers of the Old Academy. GADAMER seeks to prove that the expectation to reach TRUTH by resorting to methodologism is naive and suffers from fundamental errors and problems. He introduces extra-methodical thought and hermeneutical rationality as an alternative to methodologism and methodic rationality and defines an attention to dialectic, practical wisdom, eloquence, and the fusion of horizons as the strategy to achieve those parts of TRUTH that lies beyond methodologism.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    AZAD, ALIREZA, VAEZI, AHMED, & NAGHIZADEH, HASSAN. (2016). A CRITIQUE OF METHODOLOGISM FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF GADAMER’S PHILOSOPHICAL HERMENEUTICS. ISLAMIC PHILOSOPHY & THEOLOGY (ISLAMIC STUDIES (KALAM)), 48(96 ), 9-30. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/185814/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    AZAD ALIREZA, VAEZI AHMED, NAGHIZADEH HASSAN. A CRITIQUE OF METHODOLOGISM FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF GADAMER’S PHILOSOPHICAL HERMENEUTICS. ISLAMIC PHILOSOPHY & THEOLOGY (ISLAMIC STUDIES (KALAM))[Internet]. 2016;48(96 ):9-30. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/185814/en

    IEEE: Copy

    ALIREZA AZAD, AHMED VAEZI, and HASSAN NAGHIZADEH, “A CRITIQUE OF METHODOLOGISM FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF GADAMER’S PHILOSOPHICAL HERMENEUTICS,” ISLAMIC PHILOSOPHY & THEOLOGY (ISLAMIC STUDIES (KALAM)), vol. 48, no. 96 , pp. 9–30, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/185814/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top