A COMPARISON BETWEEN KHWAJA NAṢIR AL-DIN TUSI’S AND IBN RUSHD’S DEFENSE OF PHILOSOPHY (THE ISSUE OF THE INDIVISIBILITY OF NECESSARY BEING)

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

FATTAHI ARDAKANI IHSAN

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Essays in Philosophy and Kalam Year:2010 | Volume:41 | Issue:83/2 Page(s): 87-120

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

638

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARISON BETWEEN KHWAJA NAṢIR AL-DIN TUSI’S AND IBN RUSHD’S DEFENSE OF PHILOSOPHY (THE ISSUE OF THE INDIVISIBILITY OF NECESSARY BEING)

Author(s)

FATTAHI ARDAKANI IHSAN | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

IBN RUSHD (AVERROES)Q2

KHWAJA (NAṢIR AL-DIN) TUSIQ2

IBN SINA (AVICENNA)Q2

PHILOSOPHYQ2

DEFENSESQ3

TYPES OF COMBINATIONQ3

THE NECESSARY BEINGQ2

Abstract

Philosophy has always been attacked by the opponents, and the proponents have defended it against the attacks. Among the opponents of PHILOSOPHY, the names of Ghazali and Fakhr Razi are outstanding; whereas, Ibn Rushd and KHWAJA (NAṢIR AL-DIN) TUSI by writing Tahafat al-Tahafut and SharH-i Mushkilat al-Isharat have undertaken to counter the incessant attacks of these two and respond to their objections. In this article, the defense by Khwaja Naṣir and Ibn Rushd concerning the issue of the indivisibility of Wajib (the Necessary) are compared only by using the two books of Tahafat al-Tahafut and SharH-i Mushkilat al-isharat. However, in order to better clarify these DEFENSES, the objections of Fakhr Razi and Ghazali have also been pointed out. It will be cleared in this article that contrary to Khwaja, Ibn Rushd regards Wajib as having a quiddity but views its quiddity as the very essence of its existence, believing that Wajib is equivocal genus, consequently having a limit proportionate to itself. Meanwhile, the widespread propounding of the Khwaja’s DEFENSES among the philosophers after him is considered to be the outcome of the status of his two books, Isharat and Tajrid.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

FATTAHI ARDAKANI, IHSAN. (2010). A COMPARISON BETWEEN KHWAJA NAṢIR AL-DIN TUSI’S AND IBN RUSHD’S DEFENSE OF PHILOSOPHY (THE ISSUE OF THE INDIVISIBILITY OF NECESSARY BEING). ISLAMIC PHILOSOPHY & THEOLOGY (ISLAMIC STUDIES (KALAM)), 41(83/2), 87-120. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/185850/en

Vancouver: Copy

FATTAHI ARDAKANI IHSAN. A COMPARISON BETWEEN KHWAJA NAṢIR AL-DIN TUSI’S AND IBN RUSHD’S DEFENSE OF PHILOSOPHY (THE ISSUE OF THE INDIVISIBILITY OF NECESSARY BEING). ISLAMIC PHILOSOPHY & THEOLOGY (ISLAMIC STUDIES (KALAM))[Internet]. 2010;41(83/2):87-120. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/185850/en

IEEE: Copy

IHSAN FATTAHI ARDAKANI, “A COMPARISON BETWEEN KHWAJA NAṢIR AL-DIN TUSI’S AND IBN RUSHD’S DEFENSE OF PHILOSOPHY (THE ISSUE OF THE INDIVISIBILITY OF NECESSARY BEING),” ISLAMIC PHILOSOPHY & THEOLOGY (ISLAMIC STUDIES (KALAM)), vol. 41, no. 83/2, pp. 87–120, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/185850/en

Related Journal Papers