COMPARISON OF PICTURE NAMING ABILITY IN FLUENT AND NON-FLUENT APHASICS: AN ANALYSIS OF 4 CASES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

TAHANZADEH B.; SOLEYMANI Z.; MEHRI A.; KHODAMI S.M.; JALAEI SH.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Modern Rehabilitation Year:2013 | Volume:6 | Issue:4 Page(s): 1-7

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,008

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF PICTURE NAMING ABILITY IN FLUENT AND NON-FLUENT APHASICS: AN ANALYSIS OF 4 CASES

Author(s)

Keywords

FLUENT APHASIAQ2

NON-FLUENT APHASIAQ2

NAMINGQ2

NOUNSQ2

Abstract

Background and Aim: Impairment of noun retrieval is common among aphasic patients, but some of previous studies represent differences between noun retrieval ability of various aphasia syndromes. Current study investigates and compares the picture NAMING ability of 4 patients with fluent and non-FLUENT APHASIA.Materials and Methods: Present study investigated the NAMING ability of 2 fluent and 2 non-fluent aphasic patients with oral picture NAMING test. This test contains line drawing of 109 NOUNS. Patients were asked to name each picture with a single word. Responses were classified according to Philadelphia NAMING Test scoring system as correct and semantic, formal, mixed, non-word, unrelated and others error (no response, description/circumlocution, miscellaneous error). Then, the data were investigated in terms of descriptive statistics and analyzed by Mann-Whitney U test.Results: The score of non-fluent aphasics was more than fluent ones. The percentage of semantic errors in fluent group and no responses among non-fluent patients were more than the other types. Despite of personal differences, all error types were found in responses of patients. The difference between score and error types in fluent and non-fluent patients was not significant (p>05).Conclusion: This scoring system can define a variety of word retrieval errors. The fluent aphasics have more noun retrieval problems than non-fluent patients. Although, there are differences between two groups, but error type in picture NAMING is not a precise factor for distinguish between various aphasia syndromes and there is similarity in impaired underling mechanisms and NAMING behavior of them.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

TAHANZADEH, B., SOLEYMANI, Z., MEHRI, A., KHODAMI, S.M., & JALAEI, SH.. (2013). COMPARISON OF PICTURE NAMING ABILITY IN FLUENT AND NON-FLUENT APHASICS: AN ANALYSIS OF 4 CASES. JOURNAL OF MODERN REHABILITATION, 6(4), 1-7. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/187261/en

Vancouver: Copy

TAHANZADEH B., SOLEYMANI Z., MEHRI A., KHODAMI S.M., JALAEI SH.. COMPARISON OF PICTURE NAMING ABILITY IN FLUENT AND NON-FLUENT APHASICS: AN ANALYSIS OF 4 CASES. JOURNAL OF MODERN REHABILITATION[Internet]. 2013;6(4):1-7. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/187261/en

IEEE: Copy

B. TAHANZADEH, Z. SOLEYMANI, A. MEHRI, S.M. KHODAMI, and SH. JALAEI, “COMPARISON OF PICTURE NAMING ABILITY IN FLUENT AND NON-FLUENT APHASICS: AN ANALYSIS OF 4 CASES,” JOURNAL OF MODERN REHABILITATION, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1–7, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/187261/en

Related Journal Papers