مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

2,388
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARISON BETWEEN DOCTRINES OF JOHN HICK AND S. H NASR ON RELIGIOUS PLURALISM

Pages

  19-40

Abstract

 Religious PLURALISM looks for an answer to prove various RELIGIONs truths and salvation for their followers. JOHN HICK is called the greatest supporter in the present time.According to Kant's wisdomology, He claims that the followers of different RELIGIONs. But they receive absolute action. He has known kant's wisdomology higher than sensory experiences. There are differences among culture and perceptions for this reason, there are multiple discussions for it.To prove the viewpoint, Hick analyzes other reasons, such as RELIGIONs, leading principle of God, Differences in RELIGIONs language, share doctrine. But he can' t defend his pluralistic process. Since it was dependent on Kant's viewpoints, there were criticism for Kant. He has been criticized in proving truth of various RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCEs. In addition, each of his rules can be criticized.Seyd Hosein Nasar as a TRADITIONalist defends the PLURALISM RELIGION. He supports the viewpoint through using Islamic knowledge. But there are some criticisms for viewpoint an compatibility with TRADITIONalism and it is one of the biggest criticisms.If we want to compare religious multiplicity the two thinkers process, we will consider RELIGIONtruths and salvation of their followers and similarity and use of Hick's view about experiment, different RELIGIONs, rectification, modification, Divine RELIGIONs and their retouching that they (all of them) include main differences in two great thinker's viewpoints.Mokhtar follows as multiple RELIGIONs, Islam truth and excusableness (no truth) as other religious followers.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    MOHAMMAD REZAII, M., & KARIMZADEH, T.. (2010). A COMPARISON BETWEEN DOCTRINES OF JOHN HICK AND S. H NASR ON RELIGIOUS PLURALISM. COMPARATIVE THEOLOGY, 1(2), 19-40. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/191847/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    MOHAMMAD REZAII M., KARIMZADEH T.. A COMPARISON BETWEEN DOCTRINES OF JOHN HICK AND S. H NASR ON RELIGIOUS PLURALISM. COMPARATIVE THEOLOGY[Internet]. 2010;1(2):19-40. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/191847/en

    IEEE: Copy

    M. MOHAMMAD REZAII, and T. KARIMZADEH, “A COMPARISON BETWEEN DOCTRINES OF JOHN HICK AND S. H NASR ON RELIGIOUS PLURALISM,” COMPARATIVE THEOLOGY, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 19–40, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/191847/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top