THE COMPARISON OF IBN SINA AND MOLLA SADRA’S VIEWS CONCERNING THE IMMATERIALITY OF THE IMAGINATION AND ITS RELATION TO BODILY RESURRECTION

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

YAZDANI A.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Comparative Theology Year:2012 | Volume:2 | Issue:6 Page(s): 95-108

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

2,320

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE COMPARISON OF IBN SINA AND MOLLA SADRA’S VIEWS CONCERNING THE IMMATERIALITY OF THE IMAGINATION AND ITS RELATION TO BODILY RESURRECTION

Author(s)

YAZDANI A. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

IMMATERIALITYQ2

IMAGINATIONQ2

MOLLA SADRAQ2

IBN SINAQ2

PERCEPTIONQ2

BODILY RESURRECTIONQ2

Abstract

One of the important issues which has differentiated IBN SINA’s views from Sadra’s on psychology is the IMMATERIALITY of IMAGINATION. Although IBN SINA dealt with IMMATERIALITY of IMAGINATION by scepticism in some of his writings such as al- Mobahesat, but on the basis of his philosophy, which considers intellect as simply perceiving general notions and ascribes any partial PERCEPTION to material faculty, he dosenot belive in the IMMATERIALITY of IMAGINATION. Hence, he states implicitly in his al-Najat that imaginative PERCEPTION is material and not immaterial. In his booK al-Nafs men-al-Shefa he presents three different arguments for the materiality of IMAGINATION. In contrast, Sadra believes in the IMMATERIALITY of IMAGINATION and argues for the IMMATERIALITY of IMAGINATION in his varied writings. In his book al-Shavahed al-Robobiyeh Sadra argues metaphysically for the BODILY RESURRECTION through the IMMATERIALITY of IMAGINATION. He contends that nobody could argue metaphysically for BODILY RESURRECTION. The purpose of this paper is firstly, the comparison of IBN SINA and MOLLA SADRA’s views concerning the IMMATERIALITY of IMAGINATION and then to assess their arguments, and secondly, to assess Sadra’s arguments for the BODILY RESURRECTION through the IMMATERIALITY of IMAGINATION. It is show that the truth of some of the arguments he presented are doubtful.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

YAZDANI, A.. (2012). THE COMPARISON OF IBN SINA AND MOLLA SADRA’S VIEWS CONCERNING THE IMMATERIALITY OF THE IMAGINATION AND ITS RELATION TO BODILY RESURRECTION. COMPARATIVE THEOLOGY, 2(6), 95-108. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/191863/en

Vancouver: Copy

YAZDANI A.. THE COMPARISON OF IBN SINA AND MOLLA SADRA’S VIEWS CONCERNING THE IMMATERIALITY OF THE IMAGINATION AND ITS RELATION TO BODILY RESURRECTION. COMPARATIVE THEOLOGY[Internet]. 2012;2(6):95-108. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/191863/en

IEEE: Copy

A. YAZDANI, “THE COMPARISON OF IBN SINA AND MOLLA SADRA’S VIEWS CONCERNING THE IMMATERIALITY OF THE IMAGINATION AND ITS RELATION TO BODILY RESURRECTION,” COMPARATIVE THEOLOGY, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 95–108, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/191863/en

Related Journal Papers