COMPARSION OF CLASSICAL DISCRIMINANT METHODS WITH ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK USING DIFFERENT ALGORITM TO THE DIAGNOSIS OF MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ANDAIESHGAR BAHAREH; SEDEHI MORTEZA; KHEIRI SOLEIMAN; FARAHANI NIA MARHAMAT

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Health System Research Year:2015 | Volume:11 | Issue:2 Page(s): 349-359

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

1,151

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARSION OF CLASSICAL DISCRIMINANT METHODS WITH ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK USING DIFFERENT ALGORITM TO THE DIAGNOSIS OF MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION

Author(s)

ANDAIESHGAR BAHAREH | SEDEHI MORTEZA | KHEIRI SOLEIMAN | FARAHANI NIA MARHAMAT | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

QUADRATIC DISCRIMINANTQ3

LOGISTIC REGRESSIONQ3

ARTIFICIAL NNEURAL NETWORKQ3

MYOCARDIAL INFARCTIOQ3

Abstract

Background: Discriminant analysis and classification is one of the most practical statistical parts in various scientific scopes. Classical statistics methods have such prior hypothesizes that they should be considered; otherwise using these methods can cause some noticeable errors. For this reason, researchers tend to choose the methods with less limitation, such as nervation, so they don' t need to a specific kind of prior hypothesis.Methods: For conducting this research, is used LOGISTIC REGRESSION method, QUADRATIC DISCRIMINANT and artificial neural network method for comparison. In this study the participants are 1000 case-control data, who suffered from MYOCARDIAL INFARCTIOn. Neural network analysis was done with error least squares criterion, and is used Error Back-Propagation algoritm. Then is compared the function of three different BFGS Conjugate, gradient and Gradient descent algorithm of neural network for diagnosis of the stated illness. For analyzing data, is used SPSS, STATISTICA and R-SAS softwares.Findings: Based on QUADRATIC DISCRIMINANT method, prediction error percent, prediction correct percent, sensitivity, specificity and area under the roc curve are 10.15, 89.85, 0.8888, 0.9083 and 0.922, based on LOGISTIC REGRESSION method these measurements are 10.88, 89.12, 0.8743, 0.9110 and 0.941. And for artificial neural network method these measurements are 3.97, 96.03, 0.9561, 0.9644 and 0.966. There was a meaningful difference between are a under the Rroc curve for these three methods. Also, between three different algorithms, nervation algorithm BFGS has had the best function.Conclusion: The present findings show that the artificial nervation is more accurate for diagnosising MYOCARDIAL INFARCTIOn illness compared with LOGISTIC REGRESSION and QUADRATIC DISCRIMINANT methods.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

ANDAIESHGAR, BAHAREH, SEDEHI, MORTEZA, KHEIRI, SOLEIMAN, & FARAHANI NIA, MARHAMAT. (2015). COMPARSION OF CLASSICAL DISCRIMINANT METHODS WITH ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK USING DIFFERENT ALGORITM TO THE DIAGNOSIS OF MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION. HEALTH SYSTEM RESEARCH, 11(2), 349-359. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/192405/en

Vancouver: Copy

ANDAIESHGAR BAHAREH, SEDEHI MORTEZA, KHEIRI SOLEIMAN, FARAHANI NIA MARHAMAT. COMPARSION OF CLASSICAL DISCRIMINANT METHODS WITH ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK USING DIFFERENT ALGORITM TO THE DIAGNOSIS OF MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION. HEALTH SYSTEM RESEARCH[Internet]. 2015;11(2):349-359. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/192405/en

IEEE: Copy

BAHAREH ANDAIESHGAR, MORTEZA SEDEHI, SOLEIMAN KHEIRI, and MARHAMAT FARAHANI NIA, “COMPARSION OF CLASSICAL DISCRIMINANT METHODS WITH ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK USING DIFFERENT ALGORITM TO THE DIAGNOSIS OF MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION,” HEALTH SYSTEM RESEARCH, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 349–359, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/192405/en

Related Journal Papers