مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,356
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

DIAGNOSIS AND SCIENTIFIC FRAMEWORK DEVELOPMENT OF PEER REVIEW: A QUALITATIVE APPROACH

Pages

  73-83

Abstract

 Objective: the present paper aims at exploring the DIAGNOSIS of papers REVIEW process and also presenting a common framework.Methodology: To conduct the study, qualitative approaches and content analysis were taken. The research population is composed of all faculty members of faculties of psychology and education in the Tehran’s universities. A sample of 15 professors from Kharazmi and Shahid Beheshti universities were selected as researcher informers using purposive sampling. To collect data, semi structured interview was applied and open coding as well as selective coding were used for analysis.Findings: The findings indicate that scientific papers REVIEW should be made on the basis of 5 criteria: scientific, academic moral, article content consistency, writing techniques, and journal-article match. The results also show that there are some problems in REVIEWing papers such as non professional JOURNALS, lack of match between REVIEWers-articles, information and software weaknesses, REVIEWs prolong, bias and neglect of quality, lack of acceptable criteria for REVIEW, and moral slide of REVIEWers.Conclusion: research in the various aspects impacts on the scientific community and used for academic promotion, admit to higher levels and to obtain better employment condition. So identification of damage and develop acceptable formwork, can have significant impact in this area and could be used to reduce the bias of REVIEW domain and provide a common framework for papers REVIEW.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    MOTALLEBIFARD, ALIREZA, NAVEHEBRAHIM, ABDOLRAHIM, MOHABBAT, HEDIEH, & SADIN, ALI AKBAR. (2013). DIAGNOSIS AND SCIENTIFIC FRAMEWORK DEVELOPMENT OF PEER REVIEW: A QUALITATIVE APPROACH. JOURNAL OF EPISTEMOLOGY (LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY), 6(22), 73-83. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/193414/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    MOTALLEBIFARD ALIREZA, NAVEHEBRAHIM ABDOLRAHIM, MOHABBAT HEDIEH, SADIN ALI AKBAR. DIAGNOSIS AND SCIENTIFIC FRAMEWORK DEVELOPMENT OF PEER REVIEW: A QUALITATIVE APPROACH. JOURNAL OF EPISTEMOLOGY (LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY)[Internet]. 2013;6(22):73-83. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/193414/en

    IEEE: Copy

    ALIREZA MOTALLEBIFARD, ABDOLRAHIM NAVEHEBRAHIM, HEDIEH MOHABBAT, and ALI AKBAR SADIN, “DIAGNOSIS AND SCIENTIFIC FRAMEWORK DEVELOPMENT OF PEER REVIEW: A QUALITATIVE APPROACH,” JOURNAL OF EPISTEMOLOGY (LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY), vol. 6, no. 22, pp. 73–83, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/193414/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button